Re: Software RAID 5 problem due broken disk to substitute

2000-06-23 Thread Morten Bøgeskov
On Fri, 23 Jun 2000, Andrea Ferraris wrote: >My problem is that /dev/hdc of my PC is broken (the 1st IDE disk of the 2nd >channel) and I had to replace it with /dev/hde (it is an ATA/66 disk with a >Promise controller, that can't become /dev/hdc). > >Please, if you can, reply also to my address,

Software RAID 5 problem due broken disk to substitute

2000-06-23 Thread Andrea Ferraris
My problem is that /dev/hdc of my PC is broken (the 1st IDE disk of the 2nd channel) and I had to replace it with /dev/hde (it is an ATA/66 disk with a Promise controller, that can't become /dev/hdc). Please, if you can, reply also to my address, because I'm not subscribed to the list. The inte

Re: Raid-5 problem

1999-06-24 Thread Anonymous
Hi Matthew I am using kernel 2.2.5 and thought of another upgrade to the newer ones, but I followed several mails on this list all dealing with problems of raidtools-0.90 and the new kernels. Maybe I am wrong concerning the mails, so should also try a mkraid --really-force /dev/md0; that's how I

Raid-5 problem

1999-06-23 Thread Anonymous
My /etc/raidtab file for my /dev/md0 device is as follows. raiddev /dev/md0 raid-level 5 nr-raid-disks 4 nr-spare-disks 0 chunk-size 4 device /dev/sda1 raid-disk 0 device /dev/sdb1 raid-disk 1 device /de

RAID 5 problem.

1999-03-14 Thread Eric Ladner
This problem is probably a rehash, but here goes: I have three disks in a RAID 5 volume. For some reason, now when I boot, I get the following: Mar 14 21:18:57 shadow kernel: md: superblock update time inconsistency -- using the most recent one Mar 14 21:18: