Re: Raid developers question

2000-07-26 Thread Danilo Godec
On Thu, 27 Jul 2000, Art wrote: > After pulling out one disk (system off line), it came back on line with the > data intact... It started automatically the reconfiguration using the spare > disk. > The funny thing was, after reinserting the original disk it did not > reconfigure it automatially.

Re: Raid developers question

2000-07-26 Thread m . allan noah
Art <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > Dear Raiders, > > I installed a 2.2.16 kernel over my Suse 6.3 (2.2.13) and patched them with > raid-2.2.16-A0.txt. > Installation of the raidtools-19990824-0.90.tar.gz , which is by the way the > same as raidtools-dangerous-0.90-2116.tar.gz (I checked, but ma

Raid developers question

2000-07-26 Thread Art
Dear Raiders, I installed a 2.2.16 kernel over my Suse 6.3 (2.2.13) and patched them with raid-2.2.16-A0.txt. Installation of the raidtools-19990824-0.90.tar.gz , which is by the way the same as raidtools-dangerous-0.90-2116.tar.gz (I checked, but maybe not good enough), was a piece of cake.

Re: RAID developers ?

1999-03-18 Thread Ingo Molnar
On Thu, 18 Mar 1999, Gianni Mariani wrote: > I'm interested in developing 2 parity raid. [...] what exactly do you mean by 2-parity RAID. parity mirroring is already possible. (use RAID4 with a RAID1 as the parity disk) The Linux way is a bit more generic, it's not just 2-way mirroring, it giv

RAID developers ?

1999-03-18 Thread Gianni Mariani
I'm interested in developing 2 parity raid. You probably saw my earlier message regarding raidzz. Who are the developers of the current RAID support for Linux ? If get no response, I'll start hacking away and making really disgusting changes to the current RAID doing all kinds of messy things