RE: Never Successfully Build Raidtools

1998-10-15 Thread MOLNAR Ingo
On Tue, 13 Oct 1998, Jeremy Hansen wrote: > I'm also curious as to why such old docs are still included with the > raidtool distro. They're rather pointless since nothing seems to take > that type of mold any longer. Like what said below, a few emails from > this list pretty much makes the old

RE: Never Successfully Build Raidtools

1998-10-14 Thread Jeremy Hansen
I'm also curious as to why such old docs are still included with the raidtool distro. They're rather pointless since nothing seems to take that type of mold any longer. Like what said below, a few emails from this list pretty much makes the old documentation rather useless. Just my thoughts.

RE: Never Successfully Build Raidtools

1998-10-14 Thread Martin Gallant
Bruno Prior <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > fdisk each disk with partitions which will be included in a RAID > device, and set those partitions to type 0xfe Bruno, I reversed engineered this process as well last weekend, and I agree with everything you said except for a couple of things. The part

Re: Never Successfully Build Raidtools

1998-10-13 Thread MOLNAR Ingo
On Tue, 13 Oct 1998, CN Liu wrote: > Now I am trying to build raidtools-199810-B-0.90.tar.gz. What I got from > make are only mkraid and raidstart executables in ./raidtools-0.90 > directory. I don't see the other tools like raidadd, raidrun, raidstop, > ckraid. just do a 'make install', this w

RE: Never Successfully Build Raidtools

1998-10-13 Thread Bruno Prior
> Now I am trying to build raidtools-199810-B-0.90.tar.gz. What I got from > make are only mkraid and raidstart executables in ./raidtools-0.90 > directory. I don't see the other tools like raidadd, raidrun, raidstop, > ckraid. Yet another victim of the lagging documentation! Ingo's messages of 4