On Fri, 4 Aug 2000, Stew Benedict wrote:
> > How does a patched Kernel's /proc/mdstat look like without any
> > raid-drives configured?
>
> Personalities :
> read_ahead not set
> md0 : inactive
> md1 : inactive
> md2 : inactive
> md3 : inactive
This is what an *UNPATCHED* mdstat lo
Personalities :
read_ahead not set
md0 : inactive
md1 : inactive
md2 : inactive
md3 : inactive
On Fri, 4 Aug 2000, Felix Leder wrote:
> How does a patched Kernel's /proc/mdstat look like without any
> raid-drives configured?
>
Stew Benedict
Oooh ooh ooh! FAQ! :-) Unfortunately, it's not on the web yet, but here's
the relevant section:
2.2. How can I tell if I need to patch my kernel?
The easiest way is to check what's in /proc/mdstat. Here's a sample
from a 2.2.x kernel, with the RAID patches applied.
[gleblanc@greg
On Thu, 17 Dec 1998, Bart Schuller wrote:
> Just a very small nit: I decided to use my 2.1.131-ac11-raid kernel tree
> to make a kernel for a machine that doesn't need raid, but failed to
> link:
>
> fs/fs.o: In function `__bforget':
> /opt/src/linux.ojo/fs/buffer.c:1123: undefined reference to
