> > One quick question, did you patch the 2.2.16 kernel with:
> > http://people.redhat.com/mingo/raid-patches/raid-2.2.16-A0 ?
>
> No, but thank you very much!! I would like to know where you got
> that information. I snooped around and the most I could figure out
> is that the patches on kerne
On Tue, 11 Jul 2000, Tamas Acs wrote:
> One quick question, did you patch the 2.2.16 kernel with:
> http://people.redhat.com/mingo/raid-patches/raid-2.2.16-A0 ?
No, but thank you very much!! I would like to know where you got
that information. I snooped around and the most I could figure out
i
One quick question, did you patch the 2.2.16 kernel with:
http://people.redhat.com/mingo/raid-patches/raid-2.2.16-A0 ?
Tamas.
On Tue, 11 Jul 2000, Robert Dale wrote:
>
> Hello.
>
> To start, I installed RedHat 6.1 with root on RAID1. /boot is non-RAID.
> It's using RedHat's 2.2.12-20 kernel
Hello.
To start, I installed RedHat 6.1 with root on RAID1. /boot is non-RAID.
It's using RedHat's 2.2.12-20 kernel which seems to have extra RAID stuff in it.
RAID1 is actually built as a module so it loads an initrd that has only
raid1.o, sh, and insmod in it.
I tried to upgrade to 2.2.16 by
On Tue, 30 May 2000, Jason Lin wrote:
> If you put / and /boot on raid then probably your swap
> is also on raid.
>
No, unless you configured it this way. But be careful with swap on
raid. It is currently not save to swap on raid while an array is being
reconstructed eg. after a crash. I am us
If you put / and /boot on raid then probably your swap
is also on raid. Does having swap on raid have any
significant impact on performance?
J.
--- Holger Kiehl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > After doing more reading and lurking on this
> maillist, I'm starting to get
> > the idea that hav
On Sun, 28 May 2000, David Francis wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have just set up a new web server with two drives each configured with
> four identical partitions. The three "non-swap" partitions are all set up
> as RAID level 1 mirrors. Everything is up and running fine.
>
> md0 = /
> md1 = /home
Hello,
I have just set up a new web server with two drives each configured with
four identical partitions. The three "non-swap" partitions are all set up
as RAID level 1 mirrors. Everything is up and running fine.
md0 = /
md1 = /home
md2 = /usr
I physically removed each of the drives at diffe
Robert, i bet you are using some platform other than intel? a 64bit machine
perhaps? if this is the case, the raid code does not work properly without a
patch. byte ordering issues, it seems.
check the archive at marc.theaimsgroup.com for this patch. it was for PPC.
allan
Robert Hélie <[EMAIL P
Hi,
I have just finished configuring a RAID 1 array. Since my system was already
installed I used the "failed-disk" approach.
When I tried rebooting the system Linux told me that the
"persisten-superblock" was not the right size.
Here are the steps I followed:
RAIDTAB file:
raiddev /dev/md0
10 matches
Mail list logo
