Re: kernel not loading after application of the patch

2000-03-09 Thread Christian Robottom Reis
Sorry. Not ~mingo http://people.redhat.com/mingo/raid-patches/ Cheers, -- _/\ Christian Reis is sometimes [EMAIL PROTECTED] \/~ suicide architect | free software advocate | mountain biker

Re: kernel not loading after application of the patch

2000-03-09 Thread Christian Robottom Reis
the previous versions so I tried with the new version of > the raidpatch (0145-19990824-2.2.11 ) > after applying the patch and fixing the source files (ll_rw_blck.c) due to > a .rej file, I compiled the new kernel, everything goes fine, I boot on > that new image and get these messages

Re: kernel not loading after application of the patch

2000-03-08 Thread Jon Preston
intain a server. > I'm right now having a problem with RAID (software raid that is). it > didn't work with the previous versions so I tried with the new version of > the raidpatch (0145-19990824-2.2.11 ) > after applying the patch and fixing the source files (ll_rw_blck.c) due

kernel not loading after application of the patch

2000-03-08 Thread Saibot
e new version of the raidpatch (0145-19990824-2.2.11 ) after applying the patch and fixing the source files (ll_rw_blck.c) due to a .rej file, I compiled the new kernel, everything goes fine, I boot on that new image and get these messages Mounting local filesystems... proc on /proc type proc (rw) /dev/hda

Re: forgot the patch on 2.2.14 kernel, but....

2000-01-26 Thread Tomas Fasth
13 kernel has an 'old style' raid, > while raidtools-0.90 are designed for 'new style' raid (which adds > autodetection and other nice stuff). > > For 2.2.13 you can use the patch for 2.2.11, while for 2.2.14 you have to > get a new patch from http://www.redhat.com/~mingo/raid-2.2.14-B1 > > D.

forgot the patch on 2.2.14 kernel, but....

2000-01-26 Thread temp
I cannot find a patch for 2.2.14, not even for 2.2.12 Since redhat uses the 2.2.12 kernel -a-?? (2.2.11?) patch I wonder; is it save to use the 2.2.11 patch on the 2.2.14 kernel? Thanks for the answer patch thing happy to have it in my ~/mbox I'm very happy anyhow with or without patch, the e

Re: The patch??

1999-08-15 Thread Stephen Waters
random thoughts. do a "make oldconfig" any time you apply a new patch. this takes your old configuration as default and only asks you about stuff that has changed. another possibility is that your /usr/include/linux and /usr/include/asm are static directories w/ old headers rather than symlinks in

Re: The patch??

1999-08-15 Thread James Manning
e linux/raid/md.h problem, but I got the "is empty" warnings on both 2.2.10 with the patch and 2.2.11-ac3 (basically the same thing in terms of the s/w raid sections), and both are doing s/w raid just fine now. James -- Miscellaneous Engineer --- IBM Netfinity Performance Development

The patch??

1999-08-14 Thread maisel
Hi! After applying the raid0145-19990724-2.2.10 Patch, I get: martian:/usr/src/linux# make dep ; make clean make[1]: Entering directory `/usr/src/linux-2.2.10/arch/i386/boot' make[1]: Nothing to be done for `dep'. make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/linux-2.2.10/arch/i386/boot' scripts/mkdep in

Problems with the patch

1998-10-11 Thread tommiy
I had success with the patch by placing it in /usr/src and then creating the dir /usr/src/linux/include/linux/raid then using patch on it. Everything works fine then after completing that but before compiling add to md.c this line MD_EXPORT_SYMBOL(md_interrupt_thread); else