Lyndon David schrieb:
Hi,
I am working with the 2.2.13 kernel to set up a very simple situation where the
partitions
are just mirrored across two ide disks raid1.
which version of raid do you use? the 2.2.13 includes as i can remember
0.36 of raid and
on
Jason Clifford schrieb:
On Mon, 29 Nov 1999, Thomas Stegbauer wrote:
which version of raid do you use? the 2.2.13 includes as i can remember
0.36 of raid and
on ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/daemons/raid/alpha are only
0.90-patches for 2.2.11 which does not
apply to 2.2.13 :-(
Exec summary: will raid1 code cause read error sectors to be re-vectored ?
Full gory details:
I am having problems with some new disks, in that sectors are going bad.
I kind of didn't expect this on `new' disks, but maybe I'm just not used to
having so many sectors !
So far, the problems
In a message dated 99-11-29 06:03:16 EST, you write:
The report was:
scsi0: MEDIUM ERROR on channel 0, id 5, lun 0, CDB:
Read (10) 00 00 7d a6 c0 00 00 80 00
Current error sd08:50: sense key Medium Error
Additional sense indicates Unrecovered read error
scsidisk I/O
Piete Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Exec summary: will raid1 code cause read error sectors to be
re-vectored ? Full gory details: I am having problems with some new
disks, in that sectors are going bad. I kind of didn't expect this
on `new' disks, but maybe I'm just not used to having
Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected! Assume -R? [n] Y
Do *NOT* say Y here ! If you say Y, the stuff that the patch should add will
be REMOVED and the stuff a patch should remove will be added again (reverse
patch = make a patch undone).
Thomas
--
Thomas Waldmann ("Computer nach
Hi Piete,
I cannot see "03/11" anywhere -- did you reverse map "MEDIUM ERROR" ?
Yes, long years of painful experience. 03/11 is reported by the drive when
read retries are exhausted and a sector is not readable.
SO: Read (10) 00 00 7d a6 c0 00 00 80 00
... + ?1 ?2 ?3 ++ ++
Hi,
I am working with the 2.2.13 kernel to set up a very simple situation where the
partitions
are just mirrored across two ide disks raid1.
My question is what happens with bad blocks ? Does the underlying device driver have
any
concept of them and map them out or does a disk that develops a
