Date: Wed, 3 Mar 1999 09:50:42 -0800 (PST)
From: Chance Reschke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> ---Sequential Output ---Sequential Input-- --Random--
> -Per Char- --Block--- -Rewrite-- -Per Char- --Block--- --Seeks---
> MB K/sec %CPU K/sec %CPU K/sec %CPU K/sec %CPU K/
>---Sequential Output ---Sequential Input-- --Random--
>-Per Char- --Block--- -Rewrite-- -Per Char- --Block--- --Seeks---
> MB K/sec %CPU K/sec %CPU K/sec %CPU K/sec %CPU K/sec %CPU /sec %CPU
> 500 3742 46.8 4623 6.7 2604 7.9 6614 72.9 13314 14.6 183.
Date: Tue, 2 Mar 1999 15:20:28 -0500 (EST)
From: David Mansfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I am concerned that these stats for bonnie are in fact pretty poor for the
hardware involved. Could someone running SW RAID5 on similar hardware
comment on your bonnie findings?
I have a DAC
David Mansfield wrote:
>
> I am concerned that these stats for bonnie are in fact pretty poor for the
> hardware involved. Could someone running SW RAID5 on similar hardware
> comment on your bonnie findings?
I missed the original message unfortunately, so
I don't know what the original hardwar
On Tue, 2 Mar 1999, David Mansfield wrote:
> I am concerned that these stats for bonnie are in fact pretty poor for the
> hardware involved. Could someone running SW RAID5 on similar hardware
> comment on your bonnie findings?
>
> I have a DAC960:
>
> DAC960: ** DAC960 RAID Driver Version 2.2.
On Tue, Mar 02, 1999 at 03:20:28PM -0500, David Mansfield wrote:
>
> I am concerned that these stats for bonnie are in fact pretty poor for the
> hardware involved. Could someone running SW RAID5 on similar hardware
> comment on your bonnie findings?
...
> with 6 UW Quantum Viking II 4.5GB drive
I am concerned that these stats for bonnie are in fact pretty poor for the
hardware involved. Could someone running SW RAID5 on similar hardware
comment on your bonnie findings?
I have a DAC960:
DAC960: ** DAC960 RAID Driver Version 2.2.0 Beta4 of 13 January 1999 **
DAC960: Copyright 1998-1999
