Bonnie is available at
http://www.textuality.com/bonnie/
Jason
> hi!
>
> can anyone mail me tgz of bonnie or the web site from where it is
> available?
>
> Thanks & Regards,
> Abhishek
>
hi!
can anyone mail me tgz of bonnie or the web site from where it is available?
Thanks & Regards,
Abhishek
> -Original Message-
> From: Corin Hartland-Swann [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2000 7:53 AM
> To: Gregory Leblanc
> Cc: Holger Kieh
James Manning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [Gregory Leblanc]
> > > [root@bod tiobench-0.3.1]# ./tiobench.pl --dir /raid5
> > > No size specified, using 200 MB
> > > Size is MB, BlkSz is Bytes, Read, Write, and Seeks are MB/sec
> >
> > Try making the size at least double that of ram.
> Actually,
[Gregory Leblanc]
> Sounds good, James, but Darren said that his machine had 256MB of ram. I
> wouldn't have mentioned it, except that it wasn't using enough, I think.
it tries to stat /proc/kcore currently. no procfs and it'll fail to
get a good number... I've thought about other approaches, t
> -Original Message-
> From: James Manning [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, June 09, 2000 12:46 PM
> To: Gregory Leblanc
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: bonnie++ for RAID5 performance statistics
>
>
> [Gregory Leblanc]
> > > [roo
[Gregory Leblanc]
> > [root@bod tiobench-0.3.1]# ./tiobench.pl --dir /raid5
> > No size specified, using 200 MB
> > Size is MB, BlkSz is Bytes, Read, Write, and Seeks are MB/sec
>
> Try making the size at least double that of ram.
Actually, I do exactly that, clamping at 200MB and 2000MB current
3:29 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: bonnie++ for RAID5 performance statistics
> -Original Message-
> From: Darren Evans [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 07, 2000 3:02 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: bonnie++ for RAID5 pe
> -Original Message-
> From: Darren Evans [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, June 08, 2000 2:16 AM
> To: Gregory Leblanc
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: bonnie++ for RAID5 performance statistics
>
> Hi Greg,
>
> Yeah I know sorry about t
> -Original Message-
> From: Darren Evans [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 07, 2000 3:02 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: bonnie++ for RAID5 performance statistics
>
> I guess this kind of thing would be great to be detailed in the FAQ.
Di
I guess this kind of thing would be great to be detailed in the FAQ.
Anyone care to swap statistics so I know how valid these are.
This is with an Adaptec AIC-7895 Ultra SCSI host adapter.
Is this good, reasonable or bad timing?
[darren@bod bonnie++-1.00a]$ bonnie++ -d /raid5 -m bod -s 90mb
sult-17052000-100419 ===> /mnt/raid-hw0-sw1
/mnt/ra 2000 4096 64 28.83 46.6% 9.665 16.2% 12.09 24.2% 4.266 43.1%
Bonnie single thread
---Sequential Output ---Sequential Input-- --Random--
-Per Char- --Block--- -Rewrite-- -Per C
thanks to everyone who replied!
-tcl.
On Mon, 29 Nov 1999, Darren Nickerson wrote:
>
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> > sorry if this is a stupid question, but where can i find that "bonnie"
> > benchmarking program? i couldn't find any mention of it in th
7;re out there too. Hope that helps!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, November 29, 1999 4:41 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: bonnie.
hi.
sorry if this is a stupid question, but where can i find that "bonnie"
benchmarking progr
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> sorry if this is a stupid question, but where can i find that "bonnie"
> benchmarking program? i couldn't find any mention of it in the
> raidtools docs/howtos/etc, nor anywhere else i looked really.
http://www.textuality.com/bonnie/download.html
-dpn
hi.
sorry if this is a stupid question, but where can i find that "bonnie"
benchmarking program? i couldn't find any mention of it in the raidtools
docs/howtos/etc, nor anywhere else i looked really.
thanks for any info.
-tcl.
I just came across this on a debian mail list, bonnie++ a dirivative of
bonnie.
Its currently on v0.99b, on the web site it says
"After version 1.0 I will start work on Concurrant Bonnie++ which will be
designed to test serious RAID arrays."
Sounds like it could come in handy, the u
On Fri, 1 Oct 1999, Martin Lichtin wrote:
> I looked around, at HOWTO's, freshmeat.net, etc. but can't
> find the latest sources anywhere... does it have a home page?
Bonnie lives at http://www.textuality.com/bonnie/
Mike
--
Mike Tibor Univ. of Alaska Anchorage
I looked around, at HOWTO's, freshmeat.net, etc. but can't
find the latest sources anywhere... does it have a home page?
thx, martin
Greetings...
> On Tue, 9 Mar 1999, David Mansfield wrote:
> > Bonnie is not 'monitoring' software per se. It won't give you usage stats
> > or anything like that.
> From: Steve Frampton
> I'm beginning to think that there is *no* monitori
On Tue, 9 Mar 1999, David Mansfield wrote:
> Bonnie is not 'monitoring' software per se. It won't give you usage stats
> or anything like that.
I'm beginning to think that there is *no* monitoring software for RAID
array usage stats? ;-(
--< LINUX: T
On Tue, 2 Mar 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > I am concerned that these stats for bonnie are in fact pretty poor for the
> > hardware involved. Could someone running SW RAID5 on similar hardware
> > comment on your bonnie findings?
Er, I have a hardware RAID5 array driven b
> On Tue, 2 Mar 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > > I am concerned that these stats for bonnie are in fact pretty poor for the
> > > hardware involved. Could someone running SW RAID5 on similar hardware
> > > comment on your bonnie findings?
>
> Er, I
Date: Wed, 3 Mar 1999 09:50:42 -0800 (PST)
From: Chance Reschke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> ---Sequential Output ---Sequential Input-- --Random--
> -Per Char- --Block--- -Rewrite-- -Per Char- --Block--- --Seeks---
> MB K/sec %CPU K/sec %CPU K/sec %CPU K/sec %CPU K/
>---Sequential Output ---Sequential Input-- --Random--
>-Per Char- --Block--- -Rewrite-- -Per Char- --Block--- --Seeks---
> MB K/sec %CPU K/sec %CPU K/sec %CPU K/sec %CPU K/sec %CPU /sec %CPU
> 500 3742 46.8 4623 6.7 2604 7.9 6614 72.9 13314 14.6 183.
Date: Tue, 2 Mar 1999 15:20:28 -0500 (EST)
From: David Mansfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I am concerned that these stats for bonnie are in fact pretty poor for the
hardware involved. Could someone running SW RAID5 on similar hardware
comment on your bonnie findings?
I
David Mansfield wrote:
>
> I am concerned that these stats for bonnie are in fact pretty poor for the
> hardware involved. Could someone running SW RAID5 on similar hardware
> comment on your bonnie findings?
I missed the original message unfortunately, so
I don't know
On Tue, 2 Mar 1999, David Mansfield wrote:
> I am concerned that these stats for bonnie are in fact pretty poor for the
> hardware involved. Could someone running SW RAID5 on similar hardware
> comment on your bonnie findings?
>
> I have a DAC960:
>
> DAC960: ** DAC96
On Tue, Mar 02, 1999 at 03:20:28PM -0500, David Mansfield wrote:
>
> I am concerned that these stats for bonnie are in fact pretty poor for the
> hardware involved. Could someone running SW RAID5 on similar hardware
> comment on your bonnie findings?
...
> with 6 UW Quantum
I am concerned that these stats for bonnie are in fact pretty poor for the
hardware involved. Could someone running SW RAID5 on similar hardware
comment on your bonnie findings?
I have a DAC960:
DAC960: ** DAC960 RAID Driver Version 2.2.0 Beta4 of 13 January 1999 **
DAC960: Copyright 1998
On Mon, 14 Dec 1998 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> 2.1.131-ac11 + raid0145-19981214-2.1.131-ac9 (no autostart)
>
> 4-way P6-200, 1G ram, 10 9.1G Seagate drives (9 in raid-5 with 1 spare)
> across two aic-7880 controllers (on the MB)
>
> ---Sequential Output ---Sequential Input--
2.1.131-ac11 + raid0145-19981214-2.1.131-ac9 (no autostart)
4-way P6-200, 1G ram, 10 9.1G Seagate drives (9 in raid-5 with 1 spare)
across two aic-7880 controllers (on the MB)
---Sequential Output ---Sequential Input-- --Random--
-Per Char- --Block--- -Rewrite-- -Per Char-
how would one use these statistics to diagnose how to improve raid
performance??
hdparm -t -T /dev/md1
/dev/md1:
Timing buffer-cache reads:64MB in 1.36 seconds =47.06 MB/sec
Timing buffered disk reads:32 MB in 4.01 seconds = 7.98MB/sec
Seeker 1...Seeker 2...Seeker 3...start 'em...done...
32 matches
Mail list logo
