Re: linux 2.2.1 & 2.2.0 patch mmap.c?

1999-02-03 Thread A James Lewis
Apply which patch? Can you clarify this should the final line be:- unsigned long last = ((end-1) & PGDIR_MASK) + PGDIR_SIZE; or unsigned long last = (end + PGDIR_SIZE -1) & PGDIR_MASK; They seem to be equivalent to me, but I have the line:- unsigned long last = (end + PGDIR_SIZE -

Re: linux 2.2.1 & 2.2.0 patch mmap.c?

1999-02-02 Thread Laszlo Vecsey
This was brought up on the linux-kernel mailing list recently, I believe molnar ingo made this change, the latter representation is indeed correct. (apply the patch) On Tue, 2 Feb 1999, Stephen Costaras wrote: > > I tried patching the 2.2.1 kernel w/ the latest patch on ftp.us.kernel.org > (19

linux 2.2.1 & 2.2.0 patch mmap.c?

1999-02-02 Thread Stephen Costaras
I tried patching the 2.2.1 kernel w/ the latest patch on ftp.us.kernel.org (19990128-2.2.0). Everything worked ok except for the patch against: mm/mmap.c Seems that this patch is trying to do the following: *** *** 556,562 unsigned long start, unsigned long end) { unsi