>
> > I plan to upgrade from old-style to new-style-raid, but on a 2.2.12 kernel.
>
> Go to directly to 2.2.14, and use the patch announced on the list several
> times. It works correctly for me.
>
I recently upgraded from 2.0.33 /0.42 tools to 2.2.14 /0.90 tools autostart
with no problem at al
> ---Reply to mail from Patrick Rother about "question about reconstruction":
> > Do "cat /proc/mdstat". It will tell you the percentage of completed
> > reconstuction, and an estimated time to finish.
> > If the percentage does not increase at all, and
---Reply to mail from Patrick Rother about "question about reconstruction":
> Do "cat /proc/mdstat". It will tell you the percentage of completed
> reconstuction, and an estimated time to finish.
> If the percentage does not increase at all, and the time-to-finish in
On Sun, Feb 27, 2000 at 11:49:55AM +0100, Kelina wrote:
> I'm running a new box with redhat6.1 and 2 5400rpm 15 gig harddisks.
> There's also a cd-rom drive
> on the same controller. Both the hd's are running as masters as a Raid-1
> array, and cd cd-rom as
> primary slave. While trying to get m
-
-the cd rom should hinder your performance much.
oops... I mean "shouldn't"
On Sun, 27 Feb 2000, David Holl wrote:
-Depending on your partitioning, it is most likely reconstructing the whole
-15 gigs.
-
-the cd rom should hinder your performance much.
-
-With no out standing file system reque
Depending on your partitioning, it is most likely reconstructing the whole
15 gigs.
the cd rom should hinder your performance much.
With no out standing file system requests, raid should be reconstructing
as fast as possible. But if there is activity on the system, a command
like this may help:
Hey all,
I'm running a new box with redhat6.1 and 2 5400rpm 15 gig harddisks.
There's also a cd-rom drive
on the same controller. Both the hd's are running as masters as a Raid-1
array, and cd cd-rom as
primary slave. While trying to get my isdn to work (i managed that now btw)
i managed to ge
