RE: resync question

1998-12-17 Thread MOLNAR Ingo
On Thu, 17 Dec 1998, David Harris wrote: > It seems that you are saying that there are two states of the resync speed: > (1) full resync speed which only happens after a full second of IO silence, > and (2) the guaranteed minimum bandwidth resync speed. Are there any shades > of gray in between?

RE: resync question

1998-12-17 Thread David Harris
l devices are overlapping on my system, so this seems weird. Could you just explain this unit and how it applies. Thanks, - David Harris Principal Engineer, DRH Internet Services -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of MOLNAR Ingo Sent: Th

Re: resync question

1998-12-17 Thread MOLNAR Ingo
On Wed, 16 Dec 1998 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > The resync uses all available unused I/O bandwidth. You cannot speed that > > up, besides adding faster hardware :) > > It doesn't seem to... when the mke2fs is going and pounding the drives > all 9 access lights are pegged, but the backgroun

Re: resync question

1998-12-16 Thread jmm
> The resync uses all available unused I/O bandwidth. You cannot speed that > up, besides adding faster hardware :) It doesn't seem to... when the mke2fs is going and pounding the drives all 9 access lights are pegged, but the background resync only writes to the drives around once a second,

resync question

1998-12-15 Thread jmm
after mkraid --really-force'ing a new md0 (diff chunk size - 256k) and doing a mke2fs -b 4096 -R stride=64, I noticed that the finish= time in /proc/mdstat still runs into the hundreds of minutes. Would bonnie results on a md0 that's at "resync=9% finish=552.9min" be valid? Can I force it to hur