Re: [PATCH v2] opensm: bug in trap report for MC create(66) and delete(67) traps

2010-02-07 Thread Eli Dorfman (Voltaire)
Hal Rosenstock wrote: On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 9:18 AM, Eli Dorfman dorfman@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 10:52 PM, Hal Rosenstock hal.rosenst...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 12:43 PM, Eli Dorfman (Voltaire) dorfman@gmail.com wrote: Subject: [PATCH] Wrong handling

Re: [ewg] bug 1918 - openmpi broken due to rdma-cm changes

2010-02-07 Thread Tziporet Koren
On 2/7/2010 3:22 AM, Steve Wise wrote: Good catch, I'll update the patch and submit for 2.6.33 on Monday. NOTE: This doesn't solve our IB/openmpi regression for ofed-1.5.1. If this patch will be accepted to the kernel 2.6.33 we can take it too Tziporet -- To unsubscribe

Re: [PATCH 0/8] ib/iser: major face lift of the data path code

2010-02-07 Thread Or Gerlitz
Vladislav Bolkhovitin wrote: Or Gerlitz wrote: From where did you get those latency numbers? read iostat(8), you'll see that await is The average time (in milliseconds) for I/O requests issued to the device to be served what kind of test did you do? I connected a Linux box through iser to

Re: [ewg] bug 1918 - openmpi broken due to rdma-cm changes

2010-02-07 Thread Steve Wise
Tziporet Koren wrote: On 2/7/2010 3:22 AM, Steve Wise wrote: Good catch, I'll update the patch and submit for 2.6.33 on Monday. NOTE: This doesn't solve our IB/openmpi regression for ofed-1.5.1. If this patch will be accepted to the kernel 2.6.33 we can take it too If

Re: [ewg] bug 1918 - openmpi broken due to rdma-cm changes

2010-02-07 Thread Roland Dreier
My point, though, is that even with this patch in ofed-1.5.1, we still have an openmpi/IB/rdmacm regression. The only way to avoid this regression without changing openmpi is to disallow _all_ rdma binds to 127.0.0.1. Can you identify the source of the regression? ie what was the change

Re: [ewg] bug 1918 - openmpi broken due to rdma-cm changes

2010-02-07 Thread Steve Wise
Roland Dreier wrote: My point, though, is that even with this patch in ofed-1.5.1, we still have an openmpi/IB/rdmacm regression. The only way to avoid this regression without changing openmpi is to disallow _all_ rdma binds to 127.0.0.1. Can you identify the source of the regression?

RE: [ewg] bug 1918 - openmpi broken due to rdma-cm changes

2010-02-07 Thread Sean Hefty
Can you identify the source of the regression? ie what was the change that broke things? My understanding is that support for loopback addresses exposes an existing bug in openmpi. It tries to bind to 127.0.0.1, which now succeeds. Openmpi passes that address to a remote node for use in

[PATCH] [for-2.6.33] rdma/cm: disallow loopback address for iwarp devices

2010-02-07 Thread Sean Hefty
Since iWarp devices are not guaranteed to support loopback connections, prevent rdma_bind_addr from associating the loopback address with an iWarp device. Signed-off-by: Sean Hefty sean.he...@intel.com --- This includes feedback from Steve Wise based on the initial rfc patch. Although this patch