OFED 1.5.1-rc5 is available
Notes:
The tarball is available on:
http://www.openfabrics.org/downloads/OFED/ofed-1.5.1/OFED-1.5.1-rc5.tgz
The final OFED-1.5.1 release is planned to be on Monday, March 22.
To get BUILD_ID run ofed_info
Please report any issues in bugzilla https://bugs.openfabri
> Your are right, I missed it.
>
> Can you send me the output of ifconfig command on both ends?
>
Sure!
First machine:
eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:24:81:0E:6C:FD
inet addr:192.168.10.95 Bcast:192.168.255.255 Mask:255.255.0.0
inet6 addr: fe80::224:81ff:fe0e:6cfd
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 10:49:01AM -0700, Roland Dreier wrote:
> Including this structure is no problem in principle.
>
> > Could we use the bitfield versions of this I posted awhile back? :)
>
> I don't have that patch handy, but bitfields often end up ugly with
> endian stuff, and also some co
Your are right, I missed it.
Can you send me the output of ifconfig command on both ends?
Boris Shpolyansky
Sr. Member of Technical Staff, Applications
Mellanox Technologies Inc.
350 Oakmead Parkway, Suite 100
Sunnyvale, CA 94085
Tel.: (408) 916 0014
Fax: (408) 585 0314
Cell: (408) 834 9365
ww
Rui,
It seems that you are trying to run RDMAoE over InfiniBand device (and
probably over InfiniBand network). I believe you intent was to do actual
testing over 10GE network. Please, clarify.
Boris Shpolyansky
Sr. Member of Technical Staff, Applications
Mellanox Technologies Inc.
350 Oakmead P
Hi Boris,
thanks for the quick answer.
>
> It seems that you are trying to run RDMAoE over InfiniBand device (and
> probably over InfiniBand network). I believe you intent was to do actual
> testing over 10GE network. Please, clarify.
>
Yes, the intention is to test over 10GE. That's why I'm try
Including this structure is no problem in principle.
> Could we use the bitfield versions of this I posted awhile back? :)
I don't have that patch handy, but bitfields often end up ugly with
endian stuff, and also some compilers/architecture generate awful code
for it. What's the advantage over
Hi list,
I installed OFED-1.5.1-rc4 on a couple of machines to give a try to
mlx4_en and RDMAoE capabilities.
Trying to run ibv_rc_pingpong as:
server: ibv_rc_pingpong -i 2 -g 0
client: ibv_rc_pingpong -i 2 -g 0 192.168.60.101
results in the following output:
(client)
local address: LID 0x000
>Could we use the bitfield versions of this I posted awhile back? :)
Do you have this conveniently lying around? If not, I'll search for it.
- Sean
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info
Applications based on the rdma-cm may assume that established event
is always delivered by the the kernel stack, clarify that.
Signed-off-by: Or Gerlitz
diff --git a/man/rdma_notify.3 b/man/rdma_notify.3
index 7114ac4..82e1008 100644
--- a/man/rdma_notify.3
+++ b/man/rdma_notify.3
@@ -24,6 +24,8
Without more info, I cannot help much. Are you calling it in a save
context? You probably cannot call it from an interrupt context. Was
there a stack trace?
lihaidong wrote:
> Hi, Steve
> Could you help me with this case.
> The server has 16GB memory,linux-2.6.29, OFED-1.5
> When using ib_dma_ma
By the previous modification, the cpu notifier can return encapsulate
errno value. This converts the cpu notifiers for ehca.
Signed-off-by: Akinobu Mita
Cc: Hoang-Nam Nguyen
Cc: Christoph Raisch
Cc: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org
---
drivers/infiniband/hw/ehca/ehca_irq.c |2 +-
1 files changed
12 matches
Mail list logo
