Or,
The sysfs entries you refer to are actually introduced in commit
7ff93f8b7ecbc36e7ffc5c11a61643821c1bfee5.
Which patches in ofed but not upstream are you referring to?
-Jack
-Original Message-
From: Or Gerlitz [mailto:ogerl...@voltaire.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 07, 2010 8:42 AM
To:
Jack Morgenstein wrote:
The sysfs entries you refer to are introduced in commit
7ff93f8b7ecbc36e7ffc5c11a61643821c1bfee5
which patches in ofed but not upstream are you referring to?
Hi Jack,
I took another look, indeed the mlx4_port{1,2} sysfs entries are introduced in
the commit
you
I don't think there are applications around which would use raw qp AND
are linked against libibverbs-1.0, such that they would exercise the 1_0
wrapper, so we can ignore the 1st allocation, the one at the wrapper code.
As for the 2nd allocation, since a WQE --posting-- is synchronous,
using