On 8/13/2010 10:21 PM, Ralph Campbell wrote:
On Fri, 2010-08-13 at 12:14 -0700, Hefty, Sean wrote:
I know there is a bug with ib_send_bw -b (bi-directional)
since it doesn't create a CQ that is large enough for all the
posted sends *and* receives. I have tried several times to get the
Hi Sean,
We've seen this issue as well.
Can you send the patch directly to us ?
Added Raz from my team which replaces Ido while he is OOO.
Thanks,
Amir Ancel
Performance Team Manager
Mellanox Technologies
-Original Message-
From: Tziporet Koren
Sent: Tuesday, August 17, 2010 2:19
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 03:17:42PM -0700, Roland Dreier wrote:
I'm having a hard time figuring out what this sentence has to do with
this patch. I don't see anywhere in the patch where the sl field is
used except for copying the TOS into it, and I don't see what user
priority field might be
I'm having a hard time figuring out what this sentence has to do with
this patch. I don't see anywhere in the patch where the sl field is
used except for copying the TOS into it, and I don't see what user
priority field might be referring to.
(per the RoCE spec) the 3 LSbs of the
On 8/16/10 3:16 PM, Vu Pham wrote:
0009-mlx4_fc-Implement-fcoe-fcoib-offload-driver-fcoib-in.patch
From 0b10d95be067595dbb050d3cc2c779372038aec4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Vu Pham v...@vu-lt.mti.mtl.com
Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2010 14:47:34 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 09/10] mlx4_fc:
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 7:43 PM, Roland Dreier rdre...@cisco.com wrote:
OK but as I said I don't see what that has to do with this patch.
We thought it was appropriate to put this info here. Maybe we should
move it to PATCH0?
With current API at least the consumer only specifies the SGID
The patch is attached.
On Tue, 2010-08-17 at 04:36 -0700, Amir Ancel wrote:
Hi Sean,
We've seen this issue as well.
Can you send the patch directly to us ?
Added Raz from my team which replaces Ido while he is OOO.
Thanks,
Amir Ancel
Performance Team Manager
Mellanox
Thanks,
We'll apply it soon.
Amir Ancel
Performance Team Manager
Mellanox Technologies
-Original Message-
From: Ralph Campbell [mailto:ralph.campb...@qlogic.com]
Sent: Tuesday, August 17, 2010 9:59 PM
To: Amir Ancel
Cc: Tziporet Koren; Hefty, Sean; Ido Shamay; Sumeet Lahorani;
Hopefully, this is the last update needed to this patch and
it can be applied. It has been in use within QLogic for several months
without problems.
Changes from v4 to v5:
Removed the break; in ipoib_cm_flush_path() so now the function
comment matches the code.
Updated the error case code in
Basically, a struct sk_buff has a pointer to a struct dst_entry
which has a pointer to a struct neighbour. IPoIB uses
struct neighbour.ha to store the IB hardware address and a pointer
to a struct ipoib_neigh. When using connected mode, struct ipoib_neigh
has a pointer to struct ipoib_cm_tx which
BTW, I will be around today and tomorrow to reply to comments
but then I will be on vacation through August.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-rdma in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
11 matches
Mail list logo
