On Wed, 2010-11-03 at 07:58 -0700, Hefty, Sean wrote:
> > The following patches add a new QP type named RAW_PACKET.
> >
> > This type of QP is used in Ethernet environment and intended for
> > creation of a whole packet, including L2 headers,
>
> RAW_FRAME seems like a better name to me.
I thi
On 11/7/2010 1:50 AM, Or Gerlitz wrote:
Steve Wise wrote:
I'm working on similar code for Chelsio that will use these QPs.
Will the TX flow require going into kernel space or will be fully offloaded?
The RX/TX paths are kernel bypass unless the application wants to block
for IO.
Steve.
--
Only include the header linux/mutex.h once inside
drivers/infiniband/hw/cxgb4/iw_cxgb4.h
Signed-off-by: Jesper Juhl
---
iw_cxgb4.h |1 -
1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/hw/cxgb4/iw_cxgb4.h
b/drivers/infiniband/hw/cxgb4/iw_cxgb4.h
index 16032cd..42bb575 100644
On Fri, 2010-11-05 at 10:06 -0500, Steve Wise wrote:
> On 11/03/2010 09:58 AM, Hefty, Sean wrote:
> >> The following patches add a new QP type named RAW_PACKET.
> >>
> >> This type of QP is used in Ethernet environment and intended for
> >> creation of a whole packet, including L2 headers,
> >>
Hi Eli, can this patch of yours which you placed in ofed be pushed
upstream? Or.
>From 4237a1fbc1bae6bb86665f81cd93cfac37b216d2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Eli Cohen
Date: Wed, 3 Nov 2010 10:56:38 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] IPoIB: Fix IPoIB to conform to ethtool definitions
Ethtool documentation
Sure, I was going to. I will send later today.
-Original Message-
From: Or Gerlitz [mailto:ogerl...@voltaire.com]
Sent: Monday, November 08, 2010 9:38 AM
To: Eli Cohen; Roland Dreier
Cc: linux-rdma
Subject: re: Fix IPoIB to conform to ethtool definitions
Hi Eli, can this patch of yours w
Hi Eli, are there known IBoE fixes which are in ofed but missed 2.6.37-rc1?
Also, can the below and/or any other enhancements you've placed in ofed be
pushed upstream? it would be great to have perf counters operating fine for IBoE
Or.
>From 72c316b60f62401e031520fe3f55ec6879bbc42b Mon Sep 17 00:
Eli Cohen wrote:
> Sure, I was going to. I will send later today.
I saw that you've dropped and implementation of inline/blue-flame sending
for kernel space, what was the motivation is it sdp, rds or alike or something
else?
Or.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux
Again, I was going to send those patches upstream but I found out that each
packet is counted twice so I refrained from sending till I clear this issue.
Once I clear this I will send the patches.
-Original Message-
From: Or Gerlitz [mailto:ogerl...@voltaire.com]
Sent: Monday, November 0
