Re: [PATCH] opensm: perfmgr, only set orig_lid when we have a valid port. Otherwise leave it as 0

2011-04-18 Thread Hal Rosenstock
On 4/17/2011 9:26 PM, Weiny, Ira K. wrote: On Apr 17, 2011, at 8:21 AM, Hal Rosenstock wrote: On 4/15/2011 6:17 PM, Ira Weiny wrote: Subject: [PATCH] opensm: perfmgr, only set orig_lid when we have a valid port. Otherwise leave it as 0 Signed-off-by: Ira Weiny wei...@llnl.gov ---

[PATCH 1/2] opensm/osm_state_mgr.c: Don't rely on PortInfo:PortState for base SP0

2011-04-18 Thread Hal Rosenstock
For base SP0, PortState in SM PortInfo attribute is not used and base SP0 is always active. Signed-off-by: Hal Rosenstock h...@mellanox.com --- diff --git a/opensm/osm_state_mgr.c b/opensm/osm_state_mgr.c index 2e1ef94..dd308f2 100644 --- a/opensm/osm_state_mgr.c +++ b/opensm/osm_state_mgr.c @@

[PATCH 2/2] opensm/osm_perfmgr.c: Don't rely on PortInfo:PortState for base SP0

2011-04-18 Thread Hal Rosenstock
For base SP0, PortState in SM PortInfo attribute is not used and base SP0 is always active. Signed-off-by: Hal Rosenstock h...@mellanox.com --- diff --git a/opensm/osm_perfmgr.c b/opensm/osm_perfmgr.c index 6a1fa63..86efde6 100644 --- a/opensm/osm_perfmgr.c +++ b/opensm/osm_perfmgr.c @@ -684,6

Re: Issues with patchwork?

2011-04-18 Thread Roland Dreier
On Sun, Apr 17, 2011 at 3:47 AM, Weiny, Ira K. wei...@llnl.gov wrote: I just checked patchwork and it looks like those patches which were submitted since ~2/25/2011 are no longer there?  This includes 3 patches which were in my todo list yesterday. Does anyone know what the issue is? Does

Re: [PATCH] opensm: perfmgr, only set orig_lid when we have a valid port. Otherwise leave it as 0

2011-04-18 Thread Ira Weiny
On Mon, 18 Apr 2011 05:42:56 -0700 Hal Rosenstock h...@dev.mellanox.co.il wrote: On 4/17/2011 9:26 PM, Weiny, Ira K. wrote: On Apr 17, 2011, at 8:21 AM, Hal Rosenstock wrote: On 4/15/2011 6:17 PM, Ira Weiny wrote: [snip] There are several other calls to get_base_lid. Is it also an