Hi,
Le jeudi 21 avril 2011 à 11:53 -0700, c...@asomi.com a écrit :
An ENOMEM return does not mean that the subsystem *just* failed to
allocate system memory.
The memory that could not be allocated could be device memory.
I'm also having some difficulties with system memory
And I forgot to mention:
Le vendredi 22 avril 2011 à 12:20 +0200, Yann Droneaud a écrit :
I'm also having some difficulties with system memory allocation.
In this case of failure, strace shows the last write() syscall returning
ENOMEM.
Regards.
--
Yann Droneaud
OPTEYA
--
To unsubscribe
I've been toying with the file routing engine implementation for some
work I'm doing, but I'm finding very little documentation on it. I only
have one switch to experiment with at the moment as well so some of the
information in the lid / lfts files that are generated are not obvious
for how
The driver was never really waiting for RDMA_WR/FINI completions because
the condition variable used to determine if the completion happened was
never reset, and this condition variable is reused for both connection
setup and teardown. This causes various driver crashes under heavy
loads due to
A few more EEH fixes:
c4iw_wait_for_reply(): detect fatal EEH condition on timeout and return
an error.
The iw_cxgb4 driver was only calling ib_deregister_device()
on an EEH event followed by a ib_register_device() when the
device was reinitialized. However, the rdma core doesn't allow
multiple
Hi,
I've been testing the current opensm development head
(commit 83b67527d16 from git://git.openfabrics.org/~alexnetes/opensm),
and I've been getting some messages that are new since version 3.3.7:
Apr 22 12:08:09 646534 [411CD940] 0x01 - log_rcv_cb_error: ERR 3111: Received
MAD with error
On Apr 22, 2011, at 7:41 AM, Paul Monday (Parallel Scientific) wrote:
I've been toying with the file routing engine implementation for some
work I'm doing, but I'm finding very little documentation on it. I only
have one switch to experiment with at the moment as well so some of the
On Apr 22, 2011, at 11:19 AM, Jim Schutt wrote:
Hi,
I've been testing the current opensm development head
(commit 83b67527d16 from git://git.openfabrics.org/~alexnetes/opensm),
and I've been getting some messages that are new since version 3.3.7:
Apr 22 12:08:09 646534 [411CD940] 0x01 -
Hi Jim,
On 4/22/2011 2:19 PM, Jim Schutt wrote:
Hi,
I've been testing the current opensm development head
(commit 83b67527d16 from git://git.openfabrics.org/~alexnetes/opensm),
and I've been getting some messages that are new since version 3.3.7:
Apr 22 12:08:09 646534 [411CD940] 0x01 -
Weiny, Ira K. wrote:
On Apr 22, 2011, at 11:19 AM, Jim Schutt wrote:
Hi,
I've been testing the current opensm development head
(commit 83b67527d16 from git://git.openfabrics.org/~alexnetes/opensm),
and I've been getting some messages that are new since version 3.3.7:
Apr 22 12:08:09 646534
Thank you, your detail is greatly appreciated :)
I have one other strange question ... is it possible to carve a single
physical switch into two logical switches (put a cable between ports
16/17 and modify the routing tables ... this seems like it wouldn't work
as the Unicast LID / Switch: guid
Default is on; as this is a workaround for non compliance:
this feature is advertised but the SMA rejects sets of SwitchInfo that
actually set MFTTop.
Signed-off-by: Hal Rosenstock h...@mellanox.com
---
diff --git a/include/opensm/osm_subnet.h b/include/opensm/osm_subnet.h
index a9499dd..4bab8ee
12 matches
Mail list logo
