On 10/14/2011 10:22 PM, Hefty, Sean wrote:
Just an update: the issues that I was seeing were caused by missing
patches in my libraries (one in libmlx4 and the other in the ofed
compatibility layer). The XRC patches in for-next are testing out fine
for me, though it would be good if someone from
On 10/11/2011 7:28 PM, Roland Dreier wrote:
No, I think we need to switch to ignoring the parameter and printing a
warning if someone sets it, and then we can remove it in a year or so
done, I sent you V1 of patch 3/5 which fixes that, any other comment
for the rest of the series?
Or.
--
T
Enable the maximum size (128) supported by the device for the shadow
vlans table, igonring the module param which could override it.
This table is only used by the IBoE control plane for setting a vlan
index into an RC/UC QP context or UD Address Handle.
Signed-off-by: Or Gerlitz
---
changes fro
Hi Roland,
Thanks for the review.
The extended capabilities are indeed per port. It is possible that
every port has its own extended capabilities.
The reason I used a 64bit field for a bit is to prepare a field for
future extended capabilities.
In my opinion new capabilities will be appended to t
