That would depend on which HCA you are using. I know that you can use QLogic's
iPath interface to do what you want, but I don't think it is possible through
the verbs interface available through stock OFED.
-Original Message-
From: linux-rdma-ow...@vger.kernel.org
On 29-Dec-11 7:10 PM, Venkateswara Rao Dokku wrote:
Yes, Previously we could run those tests, but after adding some changes we
see those errors,,...
can you please suggest why those errors will occur?
I would strongly suggest to have the usual IB tests running
before even trying to run OMPI -
On 1/2/2012 7:34 PM, Hefty, Sean wrote:
this field is a -- union -- how would that work if more than one
extension is to be applied for a structure?
The fields at the end of the structure should only be accessed if the structure
is of the correct type. In this case, ext.xrc_recv is only
Hi all,
I have a question about a completion for a send with immediate data. The IB
spec (1.2.1) only mentions that the WC's immediate data be present at the
receiver. It is silent on the value on the sender at completion. It does say
that it is only valid if the WC's immediate data indicator
I'd like to better understand the allocated by the caller ... are more
difficult to deal with part of your response - for ibv_send_wr - if
the caller have set a new IBV_WR_NEW_FEATURE value for the wr type, they
surely aware to the new fields and actually the size of the structure
can change
Yes I should have mentioned that I am using a Mellanox Connect-X
adapter. Do you know where I can find documentation for QLogic's
iPath? A quick google search didn't seem to turn anything up.
Thanks for the information.
- Greg Kerr
On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 9:53 AM, Mike Heinz
I have a question about a completion for a send with immediate data. The IB
spec (1.2.1) only mentions that the WC's immediate data be present at the
receiver. It is silent on the value on the sender at completion. It does say
that it is only valid if the WC's immediate data indicator is set.
On Jan 3, 2012, at 11:55 AM, Hefty, Sean wrote:
I have a question about a completion for a send with immediate data. The IB
spec (1.2.1) only mentions that the WC's immediate data be present at the
receiver. It is silent on the value on the sender at completion. It does say
that it is only
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 5:39 PM, Roland Dreier rol...@kernel.org wrote:
Roland Dreier (2):
IB/mlx4: Fix shutdown crash accessing a non-existent bitmap
Hi Roland,
As far as I can see this fix is upstream as commit
4af3ce0de0c12e5c17811eaefad36ab8e146c0fd but is not yet included in
v3.1.7.
On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 11:18 AM, Bart Van Assche bvanass...@acm.org wrote:
As far as I can see this fix is upstream as commit
4af3ce0de0c12e5c17811eaefad36ab8e146c0fd but is not yet included in
v3.1.7. Shouldn't this patch be sent to stable such that it gets
included in v3.1.x too ?
The
It is possible with ConnectX (cf MLX QPs in the kernel driver).
However I don't know what documentation
is available and some hacking would be needed to use this for
something more general than sending
MADs on special QPs.
On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 8:43 AM, Greg I Kerr ker...@husky.neu.edu wrote:
applied, thanks
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-rdma in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 4:38 PM, Or Gerlitz ogerl...@mellanox.com wrote:
This series deals with fixes related to Ethernet 8021q vlan
priority-bits used by mlx4 code under IBoE. It is made of
one kernel/mlx4_ib patch and three user-space/libmlx4 patches.
Hi Roland,
Just a reminder... did you
applied, thanks
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-rdma in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
14 matches
Mail list logo
