Have you considered some other options to make this happen?
Could we skip creating the endpoint in raccept(), but actually create the
new endpoint during the frist receive or send? This would then allow the
fork() to occur without the complications with the pinned data.
That's an interesting
On 7/13/2012 3:58 AM, David Miller wrote:
From: Shlomo Pongratz
Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2012 20:13:28 +
The RCU and reference count protect the individual entries in the hash. The R/W
lock protects the hash table itself. e.g. deleting the hash table itself, or in
the future re-sizing it.
You
