NOTE: The following applies after previous Performance Manager patches posted
to the list.
Signed-off-by: Ira Weiny
---
opensm/osm_console.c |8 +++-
opensm/osm_perfmgr.c |7 ++-
2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/opensm/osm_console.c b/opensm/osm_co
NOTE: the following applies after previous Performance Manager patches posted
to the list.
The initial performance manager only logged Symbol Error, Receive errors, and
xmit discards. Additional errors from PortCounters should be logged.
- Change error codes to use 4C3X, allows future expans
Ah. Totally understood. I can be patient.
Lloyd Brown
Systems Administrator
Fulton Supercomputing Lab
Brigham Young University
http://marylou.byu.edu
On 07/17/2012 11:02 AM, Tziporet Koren wrote:
> Lloyd
>
> Oren just had a new baby
> I hope he will handle it fast when he will return from vac
Lloyd
Oren just had a new baby
I hope he will handle it fast when he will return from vacation
Tziporet
-Original Message-
From: linux-rdma-ow...@vger.kernel.org
[mailto:linux-rdma-ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Lloyd Brown
Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2012 7:12 PM
To: linux-rdma@vger.k
Just wondering. Did I send this to the wrong place? Am I working off
the wrong repo? I expected such a simple patch to fly through, but I
haven't heard anything. If anyone can tell me what I did wrong, I'd be
happy to fix it.
Lloyd Brown
Systems Administrator
Fulton Supercomputing Lab
Brigham
NOTE: the following applies after previous Performance Manager patches posted
to the list.
The initial performance manager only logged Symbol Error, Receive errors, and
xmit discards. Additional errors from PortCounters should be logged.
- Change error codes to use 4C3X, allows future expans
> On 03/25/2012 09:01 AM, Bart Van Assche wrote:
>> +static void srp_rport_delete(struct srp_rport *rport)
>> +{
>> +struct srp_target_port *target = rport->lld_data;
>> +
>> +BUG_ON(!target);
>> +
>
> I don't think this null check is needed, because below you set the
> lld_data before you
