On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 2:10 PM, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> Apparently unloading the ib_ipoib kernel module triggers a circular locking
> dependency complaint. Has anyone already been looking into this ?
Yes, I see that this happens here e.g when doing hot-unplug to the
underlying HW driver, seems
On 11/26/12 05:44, David Dillow wrote:
Once we know we have an issue with the QP, there is no point trying to
send anything else down the pipe. This also allows us to consolidate
code in the SCSI EH path.
[ ... ]
@@ -1683,7 +1681,7 @@ static int srp_send_tsk_mgmt(struct srp_target_port
*targe
On 11/26/12 05:44, David Dillow wrote:
> From: Bart Van Assche
>
> Some SCSI upper layer drivers, e.g. sd, issue SCSI commands from
> inside scsi_remove_host() (see also the sd_shutdown() call in
> sd_remove()). Make sure that these commands have a chance to reach
> the SCSI device.
>
> Signed-o
On 11/26/12 05:44, David Dillow wrote:
The state of the target has several conditions that overlap, making it
easier to model as a bit-field of exceptional conditions rather than an
enum of all possible states.
Bart Van Assche did the hard work of identifying the states that can be
removed, and
> Does anyone has an idea where the "s_active" lock is defined and what
> is its role?
Look in fs/sysfs/sysfs.h and how dep_map is used in fs/sysfs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
Hi Roland,
I see that you picked this, good! not sure how it happened but Eli's
signature was missing from V3 which you took, can you somehow add this
there?!
Signed-off-by: Eli Cohen
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to majord...@v
On Sun, 11 Nov 2012 11:05:32 -0800
Garrett Cooper wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Garrett Cooper
Thanks applied,
Ira
--
Ira Weiny
Member of Technical Staff
Lawrence Livermore National Lab
925-423-8008
wei...@llnl.gov
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the bod
> This series compiles, but is otherwise UNTESTED. I'll be working on that
> over the next few days, with an eye on getting as much of Bart's work
> into 3.8 as possible.
Hi Dave,
Great to have you back. Certainly I'd like to get this stuff into 3.8 too.
A couple of comments:
- I think the
Thanks, applied.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On 11/26/12 05:44, David Dillow wrote:
From: Ishai Rabinovitz
HW QP FATAL errors persist over a reset operation, but we can recover
from that by recreating the QP and associated CQs for each connection.
Creating a new QP/CQ also completely forecloses any possibility of
getting stale completions
On Mon, 2012-11-26 at 10:50 -0800, Roland Dreier wrote:
> - I think the srp_transport stuff should go through linux-scsi /
> James B.
>instead of my tree, esp. since it's shared with the IBM vscsi stuff
> (I think)
> - I see Bart had a few comments about a few of your patches, I'll
> wait
>
> I'm amenable to that, but we do need an agreed patch set, as Roland
> says. I also hate to apply the pressure, but I suspect -rc7 was the
> last -rc, so I'm expecting the merge window to open on 2/12.
I think the srp_transport bits are all simple and non-controversial.
So at least from my persp
dapltest server will start with port 45278 and increase by client thread count
during each new client connection. If you never restart the server it will
continue to increase the listen port based on new clients connecting. If you
restart dapltest it will restart back at port 45278. I am not fam
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 10:33 AM, Ira Weiny wrote:
> On Sun, 11 Nov 2012 11:05:32 -0800
> Garrett Cooper wrote:
>
>> Signed-off-by: Garrett Cooper
>
> Thanks applied,
Thanks!
-Garrett
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to majord...@
Perhaps the port is in use by the host TCP stack?
On 11/26/2012 1:30 PM, Davis, Arlin R wrote:
dapltest server will start with port 45278 and increase by client thread count
during each new client connection. If you never restart the server it will
continue to increase the listen port based o
Hi all,
Today's linux-next merge of the net-next tree got a conflict in
drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/en_rx.c between commit 08ff32352d6f
("mlx4: 64-byte CQE/EQE support") from the infiniband tree and commit
f1d29a3fa68b ("mlx4_en: Remove remnants of LRO support") from the
net-next tree.
I f
Hello,
I tried to use SR-IOV virtualization for Mellanox ConnectX2 card with kernel
3.6.7.
I met some problem as below:
lspci -v shows:
04:00.0 InfiniBand: Mellanox Technologies MT26428 [ConnectX VPI PCIe 2.0 5GT/s
- IB QDR / 10GigE] (rev b0)
Subsystem: Mellanox Technologies Device 0036
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 8:05 PM, Zhangxiaofeng
wrote:
> Hello,
> I tried to use SR-IOV virtualization for Mellanox ConnectX2 card with kernel
> 3.6.7.
I'm not 100% sure, but I don't think that the CX2 supports SR-IOV - I
think you need the CX3 for that.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send th
On Mon, 2012-11-26 at 10:43 +0100, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On 11/26/12 05:44, David Dillow wrote:
> > From: Bart Van Assche
> >
> > Some SCSI upper layer drivers, e.g. sd, issue SCSI commands from
> > inside scsi_remove_host() (see also the sd_shutdown() call in
> > sd_remove()). Make sure that
On Mon, 2012-11-26 at 10:17 +0100, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On 11/26/12 05:44, David Dillow wrote:
> > Once we know we have an issue with the QP, there is no point trying to
> > send anything else down the pipe. This also allows us to consolidate
> > code in the SCSI EH path.
> After I posted the
On Mon, 2012-11-26 at 10:46 +0100, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On 11/26/12 05:44, David Dillow wrote:
> > The state of the target has several conditions that overlap, making it
> > easier to model as a bit-field of exceptional conditions rather than an
> > enum of all possible states.
> >
> > Bart Van
On Mon, 2012-11-26 at 23:15 +0400, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-11-26 at 10:50 -0800, Roland Dreier wrote:
> > - I think the srp_transport stuff should go through linux-scsi /
> > James B.
> >instead of my tree, esp. since it's shared with the IBM vscsi stuff
> > (I think)
> > - I se
On Mon, 2012-11-26 at 09:57 +0200, Or Gerlitz wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 6:44 AM, David Dillow wrote:
> > One may also pull this series from github:
> > git pull git://github.com/dillow/srp-initiator.git ha-merge-v1
>
> Hi Dave,
>
> The kernel maintainers file specifies the followi
Hello
TLDR: get firmware 2.9.1200 and wait for 3.7.
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 4:30 AM, Jon Stanley wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 8:05 PM, Zhangxiaofeng
> wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>> I tried to use SR-IOV virtualization for Mellanox ConnectX2 card with kernel
>> 3.6.7.
>
> I'm not 100% sure, but I d
On 27/11/2012 06:04, David Dillow wrote:
We can push it through James's tree if need be, but Bart's code is
pretty self-contained, and going through the SCSI tree will introduce
merge dependencies. It'd be much easier to push it all through the
RDMA tree
Yep, this makes sense to me even witho
On 27/11/2012 02:47, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Hi all,
Today's linux-next merge of the net-next tree got a conflict in
drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/en_rx.c between commit 08ff32352d6f
("mlx4: 64-byte CQE/EQE support") from the infiniband tree and commit
f1d29a3fa68b ("mlx4_en: Remove remnant
26 matches
Mail list logo
