On 4/29/2013 11:36 PM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 10:52:21PM +0300, Or Gerlitz wrote:
On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 12:40 AM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
But I don't follow why the send QPNs have to be sequential for
IPoIB. It looks like this is being motivated by RSS and RSS QPNs are
On 4/30/2013 1:09 AM, Yan Burman wrote:
-Original Message-
From: J. Bruce Fields [mailto:bfie...@fieldses.org]
Sent: Sunday, April 28, 2013 17:43
To: Yan Burman
Cc: Wendy Cheng; Atchley, Scott; Tom Tucker; linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org;
linux-...@vger.kernel.org; Or Gerlitz
Subject: Re:
On Sun, Apr 28, 2013 at 10:42:48AM -0400, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
On Sun, Apr 28, 2013 at 06:28:16AM +, Yan Burman wrote:
On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 7:36 AM, Yan Burman
y...@mellanox.com
I've been trying to do some benchmarks for NFS over RDMA
and I seem to
On 4/30/2013 1:09 AM, Yan Burman wrote:
I now get up to ~95K IOPS and 4.1GB/sec bandwidth.
...
ib_send_bw with intel iommu enabled did get up to 4.5GB/sec
BTW, you may want to verify that these are the same GB. Many
benchmarks say KB/MB/GB when they really mean KiB/MiB/GiB.
At GB/GiB, the
-Original Message-
From: Tom Talpey [mailto:t...@talpey.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2013 16:05
To: Yan Burman
Cc: J. Bruce Fields; Wendy Cheng; Atchley, Scott; Tom Tucker; linux-
r...@vger.kernel.org; linux-...@vger.kernel.org; Or Gerlitz
Subject: Re: NFS over RDMA benchmark
Bump bump. :-)
On Apr 25, 2013, at 11:38 AM, Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) jsquy...@cisco.com
wrote:
Bump.
On Apr 22, 2013, at 1:41 PM, Jeff Squyres jsquy...@cisco.com wrote:
The old sequence of Autotools commands listed in autogen.sh is no
longer correct. Instead, just use the single
-Original Message-
From: Tom Talpey [mailto:t...@talpey.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2013 17:20
To: Yan Burman
Cc: J. Bruce Fields; Wendy Cheng; Atchley, Scott; Tom Tucker; linux-
r...@vger.kernel.org; linux-...@vger.kernel.org; Or Gerlitz
Subject: Re: NFS over RDMA benchmark
On 4/30/2013 10:23 AM, Yan Burman wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Tom Talpey [mailto:t...@talpey.com]
On Sun, Apr 28, 2013 at 06:28:16AM +, Yan Burman wrote:
I finally got up to 4.1GB/sec bandwidth with RDMA (ipoib-CM bandwidth is
also way higher now).
For some reason when I had
On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 10:09 PM, Yan Burman y...@mellanox.com wrote:
I finally got up to 4.1GB/sec bandwidth with RDMA (ipoib-CM bandwidth is also
way higher now).
For some reason when I had intel IOMMU enabled, the performance dropped
significantly.
I now get up to ~95K IOPS and
On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 12:04:25PM +0300, Shlomo Pongratz wrote:
And.. 'tss_qpn_mask_sz' seems unnecessarily limiting, using
WC.srcQPN + ipoib_header.tss_qpn_offset == real QPN
(ie use a signed offset, not a mask)
Seems much better than
Wc.srcQPN ~((1(ipoib_header.tss_qpn_mask_sz
On 4/30/13 9:38 AM, Yan Burman wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Tom Talpey [mailto:t...@talpey.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2013 17:20
To: Yan Burman
Cc: J. Bruce Fields; Wendy Cheng; Atchley, Scott; Tom Tucker; linux-
r...@vger.kernel.org; linux-...@vger.kernel.org; Or Gerlitz
Jason Gunthorpe jguntho...@obsidianresearch.com wrote:
For the TSS case, I'd say just allocate normal QPs and provide
something like ibv_override_ud_src_qpn(). This is very general and
broadly useful for any application using UD QPs.
I've lost you, how you suggest to implement
On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 11:08:19PM +0300, Or Gerlitz wrote:
Jason Gunthorpe jguntho...@obsidianresearch.com wrote:
For the TSS case, I'd say just allocate normal QPs and provide
something like ibv_override_ud_src_qpn(). This is very general and
broadly useful for any application
On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 10:40 PM, Christoph Lameter c...@linux.com wrote:
On Mon, 29 Apr 2013, Steve Wise wrote:
Hey Or, This looks good at first glance. I must confess I cannot tell yet
if
this will provide everything we need for chelsio's RAW packet requirements.
But I think we should
14 matches
Mail list logo
