Hi,
Le 21.05.2013 02:26, Weiny, Ira a écrit :
[PATCH 0/2] update to autotools How are these different (if at all)
from the patches submitted by Jeff previously?
Patches from Jeff are already applied on libibverbs.
My patches apply on top to improve a bit the way autotools are used for
On 20/05/2013 17:53, Jack Morgenstein wrote:
===
net/mlx4_core: Fix racy flow in the driver CQ completion handler
The mlx4 CQ completion handler, mlx4_cq_completion, doesn't bother to lock
the radix tree which is used to manage the table of CQs,
On 05/21/13 11:40, Or Gerlitz wrote:
2. is possible in the Linux kernel for one hard irq callback to flash on
CPU X while another hard irq callback is running on the same CPU?
I think that from kernel 2.6.35 on MSI IRQs are no longer nested. See
also
On 21/05/2013 13:42, Bart Van Assche wrote:
On 05/21/13 11:40, Or Gerlitz wrote:
2. is possible in the Linux kernel for one hard irq callback to flash on
CPU X while another hard irq callback is running on the same CPU?
I think that from kernel 2.6.35 on MSI IRQs are no longer nested. See
On 17.05.2013 16:16, Jack Wang wrote:
unable to handle kernel paging request
Hi Jack,
this should be related to the list corruption in IPoIB as list_del()
sets the LIST_POISON1 and LIST_POISON2 pointers.
Referencing these results in page faults according to the documentation
in the code.
On Tuesday 21 May 2013 13:43, Or Gerlitz wrote:
On 21/05/2013 13:42, Bart Van Assche wrote:
On 05/21/13 11:40, Or Gerlitz wrote:
2. is possible in the Linux kernel for one hard irq callback to flash on
CPU X while another hard irq callback is running on the same CPU?
I think that from
Hi Sean,
We have a user space application which is made of M (clients) x N
(servers) RC connectivity pattern using librdmacm. Basically, there are
N nodes, each running M client process and each client connects to all N
servers.
So under some unknown conditions, many of the clients
On 21/05/2013 17:13, Jack Morgenstein wrote:
I just need to verify that the patch can be applied correctly on the upstream
kernel.
The use of RCU (and not spinlock) makes sense from a performance standpoint
in any case. We do NOT want to force mlx4_cq_completion to have a spinlock
which is
On 05/21/2013 02:51 PM, Sebastian Riemer wrote:
On 17.05.2013 16:16, Jack Wang wrote:
unable to handle kernel paging request
Hi Jack,
this should be related to the list corruption in IPoIB as list_del()
sets the LIST_POISON1 and LIST_POISON2 pointers.
Referencing these results in page
So under some unknown conditions, many of the clients connection
attempts fail with RDMA_CM_EVENT_UNREACHABLE event and the status is
-ETIMEDOUT. Looking on the rdma-cm kernel code, I see that the only
location which generates this event is in cma_ib_handler when getting
IB_CM_REQ_ERROR (or
On 21/05/2013 18:24, Hefty, Sean wrote:
I don't remember this patch at all.
Alex, can you please send Sean this patch
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-rdma in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 6:24 PM, Hefty, Sean sean.he...@intel.com wrote:
One thing seen in the nodes dmesg is a message from an old patch of
yours which exists in ofed1.5.3 but didn't hit (or wasn't accepted?)
upstream saying ib_cm: calculated mra timeout 67584 8192, decreasing
used
One thing seen in the nodes dmesg is a message from an old patch of
yours which exists in ofed1.5.3 but didn't hit (or wasn't accepted?)
upstream saying ib_cm: calculated mra timeout 67584 8192, decreasing
used timeout_ms does this provides any insight into the problem?
I don't
On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 1:43 AM, Shawn Bohrer shawn.boh...@gmail.com wrote:
I appologize if I missed it, but did any support for L3/L4 CSUM
generation get added? Doesn't look like the upstream libibverbs has
it, and I don't seem to see any patches floating around.
Roland commented that he
This patch is the combination of the 2 patches supplied by Husam Kahalah
[v2] infiniband-diags/saquery.c: switchinfo support added
switchinfo support added manual
In addition, this version changes the field names to match those in Vol1 v1.2.1
and Errata.
Signed-off-by: Husam
On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 1:54 AM, Shawn Bohrer shawn.boh...@gmail.com wrote:
Are there any patches for libibverbs to add
ibv_create_flow/ibv_destroy_flow? And are there any needed patches
for libmlx4? I'm building up a stack so we can begin testing this series.
YES there are patches NO I
On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 11:43:05PM +0200, Yann Droneaud wrote:
libibverbs must refuse to load arbitrary shared objects.
This patch check the configuration directory and files for
- being owned by root;
- not being writable by others.
I really don't like this. Is there some exploit against
17 matches
Mail list logo
