On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 6:13 AM, Richard Sharpe
wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 10:55 AM, Richard Sharpe wrote:
>> On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 5:02 AM, Richard Sharpe wrote:
>>> Hi folks,
>>> I am trying to figure out the reason for the latest hang in my SMB
>>> Direct driver for Linux.
>>> Should I
On Fri, 2013-09-27 at 12:55 +0200, Jack Wang wrote:
> On 09/27/2013 12:30 PM, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> > On 09/27/13 11:20, Jack Wang wrote:
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> Currently handle of srp_rsp for task management is broken.
> >>
> >> in 6.9
> >> T10/1415-D revision 16a
> >> SRP_RSP responses that co
On 09/27/2013 12:30 PM, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On 09/27/13 11:20, Jack Wang wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Currently handle of srp_rsp for task management is broken.
>>
>> in 6.9
>> T10/1415-D revision 16a
>> SRP_RSP responses that contain either
>> RESPONSE DATA or SENSE DATA shall be sent as the minim
On 09/27/13 11:20, Jack Wang wrote:
Hi all,
Currently handle of srp_rsp for task management is broken.
in 6.9
T10/1415-D revision 16a
SRP_RSP responses that contain either
RESPONSE DATA or SENSE DATA shall be sent as the minimum length message
containing those fields.
LENGTH field specify the n
Hi all,
Currently handle of srp_rsp for task management is broken.
in 6.9
T10/1415-D revision 16a
SRP_RSP responses that contain either
RESPONSE DATA or SENSE DATA shall be sent as the minimum length message
containing those fields.
LENGTH field specify the number of bytes in the RESPONSE DATA fi
