Update: I found ways to improve active side performance from 10
million RDMA writes per second to 20 million (which I believe is the
PCIe bottleneck):
1. Use inline payload - I think this reduces PCIe traffic.
2. Use non-signalled RDMA writes + don't poll for completion for every
write - I don't k
… again … reworked as requested to use only the long option.
>From e3471983cf96c17e4353ff98a339f3ca2b767b13 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Susan K. Coulter
Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2013 13:38:11 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] Allow specification of PKey index
Signed-off-by: Susan K. Coulter
---
src/perftest
On 11/22/13 15:57, Hal Rosenstock wrote:
> Hi Bart,
>
> On 11/13/2013 1:00 PM, Bart Van Assche wrote:
>> Isn't an fdatasync() call missing after dump_func() and before fclose()
>> ? According to Theodore Ts'o calling fdatasync() or fsync() before
>> fclose() is essential during an atomic update. S
Hi Bart,
On 11/13/2013 1:00 PM, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> Isn't an fdatasync() call missing after dump_func() and before fclose()
> ? According to Theodore Ts'o calling fdatasync() or fsync() before
> fclose() is essential during an atomic update. See also
> http://thunk.org/tytso/blog/2009/03/15/d
Acked-by : Somnath Kotur
> -Original Message-
> From: linux-rdma-ow...@vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-rdma-
> ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Or Gerlitz
> Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2013 4:00 AM
> To: rol...@kernel.org
> Cc: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org; mo...@mellanox.com;
> mat...@me
