Resending as there was a typo in Subject line.
--
With reference to commit c2904141696ee19551f155396f23cdd5d95e.
It was noticed that parent interface keeps sending broadcast group
join requests if p_key index 0 is invalid. That creates unnecessary
noise on a fabric:
ib0:
On 6/4/2014 1:18 AM, Martin K. Petersen wrote:
"Mike" == Mike Christie writes:
Mike> On 06/01/2014 11:19 AM, Sagi Grimberg wrote:
+/*
+ * data integrity helpers
+ */
+static inline unsigned +iscsi_prot_len(unsigned data_len, unsigned
sector_size) +{
+ switch (sector_size) {
+ case 512:
+ retur
On 6/3/2014 7:11 PM, Mike Christie wrote:
On 06/01/2014 11:19 AM, Sagi Grimberg wrote:
/**
+ * iscsi_adjust_dl - Adjust SCSI data length to include PI
+ * @sc: scsi command.
+ * @data_length: command data length.
+ *
+ * Adjust the data length to account for how much data
+ * is actually on th
On 6/3/2014 9:16 AM, Roland Dreier wrote:
On Sun, Jun 1, 2014 at 9:19 AM, Sagi Grimberg wrote:
Although these patches involve 3 subsystems with different
maintainers (scsi, iser, target) I would prefer seeing these
patches included together.
Why? Because they break wire compatibility?
I hate
On 6/2/2014 7:54 PM, Martin K. Petersen wrote:
"Sagi" == Sagi Grimberg writes:
Sagi,
Sagi> In various areas of the code, it is assumed that
Sagi> se_cmd-> data_length describes pure data. In case
Sagi> that protection information exists over the wire (protect bits is
Sagi> are on) the target c
With reference to commit c2904141696ee19551f155396f23cdd5d95e.
It was noticed that parent interface keeps sending broadcast group
join requests if p_key index 0 is invalid. That creates unnecessary
noise on a fabric:
ib0: multicast join failed for ff12:401b:8000:::::,
stat
> -Original Message-
> From: J. Bruce Fields [mailto:bfie...@fieldses.org]
> Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2014 11:14 AM
> To: Steve Wise
> Cc: linux-...@vger.kernel.org; linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org;
> t...@opengridcomputing.com
> Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] svcrdma: Fence LOCAL_INV work requests
On Thu, Jun 05, 2014 at 09:54:31AM -0500, Steve Wise wrote:
> This applies on top of:
>
> commit e5a070216356dbcb03607cb264cc3104e17339b3
> Author: Steve Wise
> Date: Wed May 28 15:12:01 2014 -0500
>
> svcrdma: refactor marshalling logic
Sorry, I lost track--was th
On 6/5/2014 8:55 AM, Steve Wise wrote
-Original Message-
From: Bart Van Assche [mailto:bvanass...@acm.org]
Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2014 2:23 AM
To: Steve Wise; bfie...@fieldses.org
Cc: linux-...@vger.kernel.org; linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org;
t...@opengridcomputing.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH]
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Koushnir
Signed-off-by: Hal Rosenstock
---
opensm/osm_trap_rcv.c |7 ---
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/opensm/osm_trap_rcv.c b/opensm/osm_trap_rcv.c
index ce26efa..2aef40e 100644
--- a/opensm/osm_trap_rcv.c
+++ b/opensm/osm_trap_r
This applies on top of:
commit e5a070216356dbcb03607cb264cc3104e17339b3
Author: Steve Wise
Date: Wed May 28 15:12:01 2014 -0500
svcrdma: refactor marshalling logic
Fencing forces the invalidate to only happen after all prior send
work requests have been com
> -Original Message-
> From: Bart Van Assche [mailto:bvanass...@acm.org]
> Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2014 2:23 AM
> To: Steve Wise; bfie...@fieldses.org
> Cc: linux-...@vger.kernel.org; linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org;
> t...@opengridcomputing.com
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] svcrdma: Fence LOCAL_IN
Hi Roland,
Le jeudi 22 mai 2014 à 08:21 +0200, Yann Droneaud a écrit :
> Le lundi 05 mai 2014 à 19:35 +0200, Yann Droneaud a écrit :
> > i386 ABI disagree with most other ABIs regarding alignment
> > of data type larger than 4 bytes: on most ABIs a padding must
> > be added at end of the structure
Hi,
Le dimanche 11 mai 2014 à 10:12 +0300, Eli Cohen a écrit :
> Acked by: Eli Cohen
This Acked-by: tag was not applied on commit 43bc889380c2,
in for-next branch (HEAD at ca846ce98ca3).
PS: Eli, you've made a typo in your Acked-by :)
Regards.
--
Yann Droneaud
OPTEYA
--
To unsubscribe from
Hi Roland,
Le dimanche 11 mai 2014 à 10:10 +0300, Eli Cohen a écrit :
> Acked by: Eli Cohen
>
This Acked-by: tag was not applied on commit a8237b32a3fa,
in for-next branch (HEAD at ca846ce98ca3).
PS: Eli, you've made a typo in your Acked-by :)
Regards.
--
Yann Droneaud
OPTEYA
--
To unsubs
On 06/02/14 19:14, Steve Wise wrote:
> Fencing forces the invalidate to only happen after all subsequent send
> work requests have been completed.
Shouldn't that read "prior" instead of "subsequent" ?
Bart.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a
16 matches
Mail list logo