We run those patches and we would like to see them upstream.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-rdma in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 01:13:04PM +0300, Or Gerlitz wrote:
From: Moshe Lazer mos...@mellanox.com
Add a device capability flag IB_DEVICE_IP_SUM to denote checksum offload
support. Devices should set this flag if they support insertion of IP, TCP
and UDP checksums on outgoing IP packets sent
On Jun 14, 2015, at 10:31 AM, Or Gerlitz gerlitz...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 8:35 AM, Doug Ledford dledf...@redhat.com wrote:
I ran across a problem today when I went to do some run tests of my
for-4.2 tree. For a second there, I was about to seriously have a
conniption
Persuant to Liran's comments on node_type on linux-rdma
mailing list:
In an effort to reform the RDMA core and ULPs to minimize use of
node_type in struct ib_device, an additional bit is added to
struct ib_device for is_switch (IB switch). This is needed
to be initialized by any IB switch device
On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 04:18:27PM -0400, Hal Rosenstock wrote:
In addition, an ib_switch helper was added to ib_verbs.h
based on the is_switch device bit rather than node_type
(although those should be consistent).
This is basically fine, but it would be nicer to change the port
handling
On 6/18/2015 4:25 PM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
Ira had patch that made some functions related to this public, not
sure if it is applied yet..
Which patch from Ira are you referring to ?
-- Hal
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-rdma in
the body of a message to
In an effort to reform the RDMA core and ULPs to minimize use of
node_type in struct ib_device, an additional bit is added to
struct ib_device for is_switch (IB switch). This is needed
to be initialized by any IB switch device driver. This is a
NEW requirement on such device drivers which are
On Jun 16, 2015, at 5:05 PM, Liran Liss lir...@mellanox.com wrote:
From: Doug Ledford [mailto:dledf...@redhat.com]
No. RoCE is as an open standard from the IBTA with the exact same RDMA
protocol semantics as InfiniBand and a clear set of compliancy rules without
which an implementation
From: Weiny, Ira [mailto:ira.we...@intel.com]
ib_verbs define an *extensive* direct HW access API, which is constantly
evolving.
This is the problem with verbs...
Huh?
It is its strength, if you don't break backward compatibility...
You cannot describe the intricate object relations
On 6/18/2015 4:25 PM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
Ira had patch that made some functions related to this public, not
sure if it is applied yet..
Which patch from Ira are you referring to ?
This patch which is in Dougs for 4.2 tree:
commit ca0369e31d1794a4f4e39c52fe39b0406617e2b4
Author:
Persuant to Liran's comments on node_type on linux-rdma
mailing list:
In an effort to reform the RDMA core and ULPs to minimize use of
node_type in struct ib_device, an additional bit is added to
struct ib_device for is_switch (IB switch). This is needed
to be initialized by any IB switch device
In an effort to reform the RDMA core and ULPs to minimize use of
node_type in struct ib_device, an additional bit is added to
struct ib_device for is_switch (IB switch). This is needed
to be initialized by any IB switch device driver. This is a
NEW requirement on such device drivers which are
On 17/06/2015 20:18, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 08:26:26AM +0300, Haggai Eran wrote:
On 15/06/2015 20:08, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 11:47:13AM +0300, Haggai Eran wrote:
Instead of relying on a the ib_cm module to check an incoming CM request's
private
On 17/06/2015 20:06, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 02:25:07PM +0300, Haggai Eran wrote:
Regarding APM, currently the ib_cm code always sends the GMP to the
primary path anyway, right? And in any case, one would expect the
primary path's GID to have a valid net_device and
14 matches
Mail list logo
