On Mon, Jul 6, 2015 at 5:44 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> If we really wanted to we could consider arch_phys_wc_add()
I mean adding a __arch_phys_wc_add() which does not check for pat_enabled().
> and
> deal with that this will not check for pat_enabled() and forces MTRR...
> I think Andy Luto
Hi,
> From: linux-rdma-ow...@vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-rdma-
> ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Christopher Mitchell
> Sent: Tuesday, July 07, 2015 5:21 AM
>
> Roland,
>
> My libmlx4 is named libmlx4-rdmav2.so and timestamped 2014-01-01 (from
> the package libmlx4-1, 1.0.5-1ubuntu1 for U
On 7/6/2015 5:35 PM, Steve Wise wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Sagi Grimberg [mailto:sa...@dev.mellanox.co.il]
Sent: Monday, July 06, 2015 2:51 AM
To: Steve Wise; dledf...@redhat.com
Cc: infinip...@intel.com; sa...@mellanox.com; ogerl...@mellanox.com;
r...@mellanox.com; linux-rdma@vg
Roland,
My libmlx4 is named libmlx4-rdmav2.so and timestamped 2014-01-01 (from
the package libmlx4-1, 1.0.5-1ubuntu1 for Ubuntu Trusty 14.04). I use
a mutex-protected FIFO of send buffers to make sure only one thread is
able to acquire a particular send buffer at a time, and my application
does no
On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 05:52:18AM -0400, Andy Walls wrote:
> On June 29, 2015 2:55:05 AM EDT, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >
> >* Andy Walls wrote:
> >
> >> On Fri, 2015-06-26 at 10:45 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >> > * Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> >> >
> >> > > On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 08:51:47AM +0200,
Hi Steve & Co,
On Sun, 2015-07-05 at 12:44 -0500, Steve Wise wrote:
> The following series implements support for iWARP transports in the iSER
> initiator and target. This is based on Doug's k.o/for-4.2 branch.
>
> I've tested this on cxgb4 and mlx4 hardware.
>
> Changes since V4:
>
> iser: fi
Hello Steve,
>> how can I reproduce the original bug/issue and then test this fix on
>> iw_cxgb4?
Have iwpmd running and start an rdma application.
Leave the rdma application running and restart the iwpmd.
When you stop the application, if you have the debug enabled, you will see that
the rem
> > > +/* Local service status attribute */
> > > +enum {
> > > + LS_NLA_STATUS_SUCCESS = 0,
> > > + LS_NLA_STATUS_EINVAL,
> > > + LS_NLA_STATUS_ENODATA,
> > > + LS_NLA_STATUS_MAX
> > > +};
> >
> > So, this is never used, there seems to be a bunch of never used stuff
> > - please audit everything
> From: Jason Gunthorpe [mailto:jguntho...@obsidianresearch.com]
> Sent: Friday, July 03, 2015 5:16 PM
> To: Wan, Kaike
> Cc: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org; Fleck, John; Weiny, Ira
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 1/4] IB/netlink: Add defines for local service requests
> through netlink
>
> On Tue, Jun 30, 2
> -Original Message-
> From: Tatyana Nikolova [mailto:tatyana.e.nikol...@intel.com]
> Sent: Thursday, July 02, 2015 12:46 PM
> To: Doug Ledford
> Cc: john.s.laco...@intel.com; sw...@opengridcomputing.com;
> linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: [PATCH for-4.2 0/1] RDMA/core: Fixes for po
On Mon, Jul 06, 2015 at 05:08:08PM +0300, Yishai Hadas wrote:
> The patch that introduces this bug was added 5 years ago by Alex Chiang and
> Signed-off-by: Roland Dreier.
>
> Look at commit ID:2a72f212263701b927559f6850446421d5906c41, it can be seen
> also at:
> http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/
> -Original Message-
> From: linux-rdma-ow...@vger.kernel.org
> [mailto:linux-rdma-ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Sagi Grimberg
> Sent: Monday, July 06, 2015 11:18 AM
> To: Steve Wise; dledf...@redhat.com
> Cc: sa...@mellanox.com; ogerl...@mellanox.com; r...@mellanox.com;
> linux-r
On 07/06/2015 09:35 AM, Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) wrote:
> On Jun 17, 2015, at 10:25 AM, Doug Ledford
> wrote:
>>
>> The patch is accepted, I just haven’t pushed it out yet.
>
> Is there a timeline for when this patch will be available in the
> upstream git repo and released in a new version of li
On 7/6/2015 5:37 PM, Steve Wise wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Sagi Grimberg [mailto:sa...@dev.mellanox.co.il]
Sent: Monday, July 06, 2015 2:54 AM
To: Steve Wise; dledf...@redhat.com
Cc: sa...@mellanox.com; ogerl...@mellanox.com; r...@mellanox.com;
linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org; e...@me
> -Original Message-
> From: Sagi Grimberg [mailto:sa...@dev.mellanox.co.il]
> Sent: Monday, July 06, 2015 2:59 AM
> To: Steve Wise; dledf...@redhat.com
> Cc: sa...@mellanox.com; ogerl...@mellanox.com; r...@mellanox.com;
> linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org; e...@mellanox.com; target-
> de...@vg
> -Original Message-
> From: Sagi Grimberg [mailto:sa...@dev.mellanox.co.il]
> Sent: Monday, July 06, 2015 2:54 AM
> To: Steve Wise; dledf...@redhat.com
> Cc: sa...@mellanox.com; ogerl...@mellanox.com; r...@mellanox.com;
> linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org; e...@mellanox.com; target-
> de...@vg
> -Original Message-
> From: Sagi Grimberg [mailto:sa...@dev.mellanox.co.il]
> Sent: Monday, July 06, 2015 2:51 AM
> To: Steve Wise; dledf...@redhat.com
> Cc: infinip...@intel.com; sa...@mellanox.com; ogerl...@mellanox.com;
> r...@mellanox.com; linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org;
> e...@mellanox
> -Original Message-
> From: Haggai Eran [mailto:hagg...@mellanox.com]
> Sent: Monday, July 06, 2015 2:09 AM
> To: Steve Wise; dledf...@redhat.com
> Cc: sa...@mellanox.com; ogerl...@mellanox.com; r...@mellanox.com;
> linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org; e...@mellanox.com; target-
> de...@vger.ker
> -Original Message-
> From: Christoph Hellwig [mailto:h...@infradead.org]
> Sent: Monday, July 06, 2015 12:26 AM
> To: Steve Wise
> Cc: dledf...@redhat.com; sa...@mellanox.com; ogerl...@mellanox.com;
> r...@mellanox.com; linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org;
> e...@mellanox.com; target-de...@vger
> -Original Message-
> From: Christoph Hellwig [mailto:h...@infradead.org]
> Sent: Monday, July 06, 2015 12:25 AM
> To: Steve Wise
> Cc: dledf...@redhat.com; sa...@mellanox.com; ogerl...@mellanox.com;
> r...@mellanox.com; linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org;
> e...@mellanox.com; target-de...@vger
On 6/30/2015 9:40 PM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 01:26:05PM +0300, Yishai Hadas wrote:
struct ib_uverbs_device {
- struct kref ref;
+ struct kref comp_ref;
+ struct kref fr
On Jun 17, 2015, at 10:25 AM, Doug Ledford wrote:
>
> The patch is accepted, I just haven’t pushed it out yet.
Is there a timeline for when this patch will be available in the upstream git
repo and released in a new version of libibverbs?
I ask because we'd like to see this patch get into upst
On 7/6/2015 2:22 AM, Steve Wise wrote:
The semantics for MR access flags are not consistent across RDMA
protocols. So rather than have applications try and glean what they
need, have them pass in the intended roles and attributes for the MR to
be allocated and let the RDMA core select the approp
On 7/6/2015 2:22 AM, Steve Wise wrote:
The semantics for MR access flags are not consistent across RDMA
protocols. So rather than have applications try and glean what they
need, have them pass in the intended roles and attributes for the MR to
be allocated and let the RDMA core select the approp
On 7/5/2015 8:45 PM, Steve Wise wrote:
Use the device's max_sge_rd capability to compute the target's read sge
depth. Save both the read and write max_sge values in the isert_conn
struct, and use these when creating RDMA_WRITE/READ work requests.
Signed-off-by: Steve Wise
Reviewed-by: Sagi G
On 7/5/2015 8:45 PM, Steve Wise wrote:
iWARP devices require REMOTE_WRITE for MRs used as the destination of
an RDMA READ. So if the device protocol is iWARP, then set REMOTE_WRITE
when allocating the DMA MR.
Signed-off-by: Steve Wise
Reviewed-by: Sagi Grimberg
--
To unsubscribe from this l
On 7/5/2015 8:44 PM, Steve Wise wrote:
Currently the sg tablesize, which dictates fast register page list
depth to use, does not take into account the limits of the rdma device.
So adjust it once we discover the device fastreg max depth limit. Also
adjust the max_sectors based on the resulting s
On 06/07/2015 02:22, Steve Wise wrote:
> +int rdma_device_access_flags(struct ib_pd *pd, int roles, int attrs)
> +{
> + int access_flags = attrs;
> +
> + if (roles & RDMA_MRR_RECV)
> + access_flags |= IB_ACCESS_LOCAL_WRITE;
> +
> + if (roles & RDMA_MRR_WRITE_DEST)
> +
28 matches
Mail list logo
