Running checkpatch.pl on mad.c produces several
ERROR: code indent should use tabs where possible messages.
This patch fixes these.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Becker jeffrey.c.bec...@nasa.gov
---
drivers/staging/hfi1/mad.c | 10 +-
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git
On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 11:34:58PM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
How is this going to work for drivers that might consumer multiple
MRs per request like SRP or similar upcoming block drivers? Unless
you want to allocate a potentially large number of MRs for each
request that scheme doesn't
Even though we don't expect the group to be created by the SM we
sill need to provide all the parameters to force the SM to validate
they are correct.
Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe jguntho...@obsidianresearch.com
---
drivers/infiniband/ulp/ipoib/ipoib_multicast.c | 47 +-
We expect send only joins to fail, it just means there are no listeners
for the group. The correct thing to do is silently drop the packet
at source.
Eg avahi will full join 224.0.0.251 which causes a send only IGMP packet
to 224.0.0.22, and then a warning level kmessage like this:
ib0:
On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 08:52:09AM -0400, kaike@intel.com wrote:
+static LIST_HEAD(ib_nl_request_list);
+static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(ib_nl_request_lock);
+static atomic_t ib_nl_sa_request_seq;
+static struct workqueue_struct *ib_nl_wq;
+static struct delayed_work ib_nl_timed_work;
+static
On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 08:52:05AM -0400, kaike@intel.com wrote:
Some tests with namespace have been performed:
1. An unprivileged user cannot bind to the RDMA_NL_GROUP_LS multicast
group;
2. An unprivileged user cannot create a new network namespace. However,
it can create a new
On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 01:04:13PM -0600, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
Trying to decouple the sub resources, ie by separately pooling the
MR/SQE/etc, is just unnecessary complexity, IMHO.. NFS client already
had serioues bugs in this area.
So, I turn to the idea that every ULP should work as the
