On Wed, 28 Oct 2015 at 04:30:10 +, Weiny, Ira wrote:
> Until we can remove the spinlock the current proposed patch should be applied
> in the interim. Sorry for the noise before.
> Reviewed-By: Ira Weiny
Hi,
is this patch expected to be applied ?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send th
On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 05:12:14PM -0800, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On 11/12/2015 09:59 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> >[ 108.998574] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 1258 at kernel/sched/core.c:7389
> >__might_sleep+0xa7/0xb0()
> >[ 108.998580] do not call blocking ops when !TASK_RUNNING; state=1 set
>
> A
On 11/12/2015 09:59 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
[ 108.998574] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 1258 at kernel/sched/core.c:7389
__might_sleep+0xa7/0xb0()
[ 108.998580] do not call blocking ops when !TASK_RUNNING; state=1 set
Although this is most likely unrelated to the issue reported at the
start of
> IIRC responding to Get(CPI) is mandatory?
Maybe the drivers are responding? I don't believe that the CM does.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-i
On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 08:30:55PM +, Hefty, Sean wrote:
> > > + /* CM attributes other than ClassPortInfo only use Send method
> > */
> > > + if (mad_hdr->mgmt_class == IB_MGMT_CLASS_CM) {
> > > + if (mad_hdr->attr_id != IB_MGMT_CLASSPORTINFO_ATTR_ID) {
> > > +
The major todo for the hfi1 driver in staging is getting rid of the verbs
code duplication between ipath, qib, and now hfi1. The ipath driver has been
deprecated and is going to be deleted soon. So that leaves qib and hfi. To
address this we have proposed rdmavt which will be a common kmod that
> > + /* CM attributes other than ClassPortInfo only use Send method
> */
> > + if (mad_hdr->mgmt_class == IB_MGMT_CLASS_CM) {
> > + if (mad_hdr->attr_id != IB_MGMT_CLASSPORTINFO_ATTR_ID) {
> > + if (mad_hdr->method != IB_MGMT_METHOD_S
On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 09:47:13AM -0500, Chuck Lever wrote:
> I wish git send-mail had an address book. I’m really tired
> of misspelling the to/cc addresses on patches.
It does:
CONFIGURATION
sendemail.aliasesfile
To avoid typing long email addresses, point this to one or more
On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 01:48:50PM +0200, Hal Rosenstock wrote:
>
> Receipt of CM MAD with response method for other than ClassPortInfo
> attribute is invalid.
>
> CM attributes other than ClassPortInfo use send method only
> and GetResp is valid for ClassPortInfo attribute.
> Note also that the
On 11/12/2015 03:48 AM, Hal Rosenstock wrote:
A new SRP target has been observed to respond to Send CM REQ
with GetResp of CM REQ with bad status. This is non conformant
with IBA spec but exposes a vulnerability in the current MAD/CM
code which will respond to the incoming GetResp of CM REQ as if
On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 01:07:44PM -0800, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On 11/10/2015 09:15 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> >scsi host3: ib_srp: failed receive status WR flushed (5) for iu
> >880313f4ca40
>
> Can you also post the logs from the target system from around the time this
> message was
On Mon, Nov 09, 2015 at 09:25:53AM -0500, Dennis Dalessandro wrote:
On Mon, Nov 09, 2015 at 01:32:03PM +, Kamal Heib wrote:
Hi Dennis,
I forked from your rdmavt project at Github and created pull request [1].
Could you please check my pull request for the following patches:
Author: K
> Receipt of CM MAD with response method for other than ClassPortInfo
> attribute is invalid.
>
> CM attributes other than ClassPortInfo use send method only
> and GetResp is valid for ClassPortInfo attribute.
> Note also that the CM ClassPortInfo is not currently supported.
>
> The SRP initiator
On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 3:25 PM, Dennis Dalessandro
wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 08:04:01AM +0200, Or Gerlitz wrote:
>> Dennis, can we have less camelcase sort of speak in this upstream driver?
>> this is linux here not windowZ.
> I plan to just remove this function.
> See: http://www.spinic
On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 09:47:13AM -0500, Chuck Lever wrote:
> I wish git send-mail had an address book. I’m really tired
> of misspelling the to/cc addresses on patches.
Hah. Yeah, my hack is a text file of addresses that I cut-and-paste
from.
--b.
>
> Resending so there is one thread for all
I wish git send-mail had an address book. I’m really tired
of misspelling the to/cc addresses on patches.
Resending so there is one thread for all replies. Apologies
for the noise.
> Begin forwarded message:
>
> From: Chuck Lever
> Subject: [PATCH] svcrdma: Do not send XDR roundup bytes for a
> On Nov 12, 2015, at 9:19 AM, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
>
> On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 03:20:33PM -0500, Chuck Lever wrote:
>>
>>> On Nov 3, 2015, at 3:10 PM, Chuck Lever wrote:
>>>
>>>
On Oct 16, 2015, at 9:30 AM, Chuck Lever wrote:
Minor optimization: when dealing with write ch
On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 03:20:33PM -0500, Chuck Lever wrote:
>
> > On Nov 3, 2015, at 3:10 PM, Chuck Lever wrote:
> >
> >
> >> On Oct 16, 2015, at 9:30 AM, Chuck Lever wrote:
> >>
> >> Minor optimization: when dealing with write chunk XDR roundup, do
> >> not post a Write WR for the zero byte
On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 08:04:01AM +0200, Or Gerlitz wrote:
On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 3:39 PM, Dennis Dalessandro
wrote:
On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 08:25:35AM +0200, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 12:34:37AM -0500, ira.we...@intel.com wrote:
From: Dennis Dalessandro
+int snoop_sen
> -Original Message-
> From: gre...@linuxfoundation.org [mailto:gre...@linuxfoundation.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 11, 2015 11:24 AM
> > If you move the variables to the top and have the early return as you
> > suggest,
> then in some CONFIG cases, there will be all those automatic v
Receipt of CM MAD with response method for other than ClassPortInfo
attribute is invalid.
CM attributes other than ClassPortInfo use send method only
and GetResp is valid for ClassPortInfo attribute.
Note also that the CM ClassPortInfo is not currently supported.
The SRP initiator does not maint
21 matches
Mail list logo
