On Tue, 2013-10-08 at 20:55 -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
Why not add a minimum number to pci_enable_msix(), i.e.:
pci_enable_msix(pdev, msix_entries, nvec, minvec)
... which means nvec is the number of interrupts *requested*, and
minvec is the minimum acceptable number (otherwise fail).
On Mon, 2013-10-07 at 14:01 -0400, Tejun Heo wrote:
I don't think the same race condition would happen with the loop. The
problem case is where multiple msi(x) allocation fails completely
because the global limit went down before inquiry and allocation. In
the loop based interface, it'd
On Sun, 2013-10-06 at 08:02 +0200, Alexander Gordeev wrote:
On Sun, Oct 06, 2013 at 08:46:26AM +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
On Sat, 2013-10-05 at 16:20 +0200, Alexander Gordeev wrote:
So my point is - drivers should first obtain a number of MSIs they *can*
get, then *derive
On Sat, 2013-10-05 at 16:20 +0200, Alexander Gordeev wrote:
So my point is - drivers should first obtain a number of MSIs they *can*
get, then *derive* a number of MSIs the device is fine with and only then
request that number. Not terribly different from memory or any other type
of resource
On Wed, 2013-05-22 at 07:26 -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
git://sources.calxeda.com/kernel/linux.git of-platform-removal
Ben,
Did you have a chance to test this? I want to get this into -next.
I tested the one in for-next (sorry for the high latency). Works fine.
Ack.
Cheers,
Ben.
--
To
On Wed, 2013-05-22 at 07:26 -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
Did you have a chance to test this? I want to get this into -next.
Ah sorry, skipped out of my mind, I'll get to it asap...
Cheers,
Ben.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-rdma in
the body of a message to
On Thu, 2013-04-25 at 10:23 -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
Ben, Can I have your Ack for this? The change is straightforward and
neither of the 2 drivers used the id parameter that is removed.
Didn't you get my mail about a compile failure caused by this patch ?
Or did you send an update that I
On Thu, 2013-04-25 at 14:14 -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
On 04/25/2013 12:35 PM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
On Thu, 2013-04-25 at 10:23 -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
Ben, Can I have your Ack for this? The change is straightforward and
neither of the 2 drivers used the id parameter
On Thu, 2010-08-19 at 23:10 -0500, Sonny Rao wrote:
the eHCA driver registers a MR for all of kernel memory, but makes the
assumption that valid memory exists at KERNELBASE. This assumption
may not be true in the case of a relocatable kernel, so use KERNELBASE
+ PHYSICAL_START to get the true
