Hi Doug,
I am trying to rping server, but it fails when bound to any address other then
IF_ANY.
# rping -s -a 102.1.1.129 -C1 -p -vd
created cm_id 0x23d7800
rdma_bind_addr: No such file or directory
destroy cm_id 0x23d7800
If bound to IF_ANY address, server starts but client fails to estab
On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 23:55:54 -0800, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Fri, 2014-11-21 at 12:52 +0530, Hariprasad Shenai wrote:
> > This patch cleanups all filter related macros/register defines that are
> > defined
> > in t4fw_api.h and the affected files.
>
> Is there any real value in the FW_FILTER_W
On Wed, Nov 05, 2014 at 14:54:43 -0500, David Miller wrote:
> From: Hariprasad Shenai
> Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2014 08:20:54 +0530
>
> > It's not really the "hardware" which generates these hardware constant
> > symbolic
> > macros/register defines of course, it's scripts developed by the hardware
>
On Wed, Mar 05, 2014 at 17:58:19 -0600, Steve Wise wrote:
> > > BTW, if you're frustrated from having to send these patches so many
> > > times because of changes being requested, this is the main reason
> > > why you shouldn't queue up such enormous numbers of patches at one
> > > time.
> > >
> >
On Tue, Mar 04, 2014 at 23:22:46 +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Thu, 2014-02-27 at 13:05 -0500, David Miller wrote:
> > From: "Steve Wise"
> > Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2014 11:11:49 -0600
> >
> > >>
> > >> > -static int allow_db_fc_on_t5;
> > >> > -module_param(allow_db_fc_on_t5, int, 0644);
> > >> >
On Tue, Mar 04, 2014 at 13:22:26 -0500, David Miller wrote:
>
> BTW, if you're frustrated from having to send these patches so many
> times because of changes being requested, this is the main reason
> why you shouldn't queue up such enormous numbers of patches at one
> time.
>
> Please try to ke
On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 14:16:47 -0800, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> While running namespace checks I found several this:
>
> Subject: cxgb4: make functions static and remove dead code
>
> Cleanup by making local functions static.
>
> The code to load config file is unreachable in net-next, probab
