Do the umad and rmpp headers leave the sm_key on an 8 byte boundary?
-Original Message-
From: linux-rdma-ow...@vger.kernel.org
[mailto:linux-rdma-ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Ira Weiny
Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2013 1:22 PM
To: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Hal Rosenstock;
by the user as in stock OFED.
-Original Message-
From: Jason Gunthorpe [mailto:jguntho...@obsidianresearch.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2012 1:12 PM
To: Ira Weiny
Cc: Heinz, Michael William; linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org; Doug Ledford; Bob
Ciotti; James Silva
Subject: Re: [RFC] Proposal
I like this idea - but it reminds me of a related issue I raised a while back:
nodes can often set the HCA description before they received a hostname from
DHCP - in which case you end up with saqueries full of localhost HCA-1.
At the time, QLogic's proposal was to modify the kernel stack so
chain.
-Original Message-
From: Jason Gunthorpe [mailto:jguntho...@obsidianresearch.com]
Sent: Monday, April 02, 2012 2:46 PM
To: Heinz, Michael William
Cc: Ira Weiny; linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org; Doug Ledford; Bob Ciotti; James Silva
Subject: Re: [RFC] Proposal to change Node Description
Alex - is this patch acceptable? My connectivity has been knocked for a loop by
the transition to Intel and I'm not sure if you received this or not.
-Original Message-
From: linux-rdma-ow...@vger.kernel.org
[mailto:linux-rdma-ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Mike Heinz
Sent:
