Re: [PATCH] ummunotify: Userspace support for MMU notifications

2010-04-12 Thread Pavel Machek
Hi! > I am resubmitting this patch because I believe that the discussion > has shown this to be an acceptable solution. I have fixed the 32 bit > build errors, but other than that change, the code is the same as > Roland's V3 patch. > > From: Roland Dreier > > As discussed in

Re: [ofa-general] Re: [GIT PULL] please pull ummunotify

2009-10-02 Thread Pavel Machek
Hi! > In the end this seems to just take the ummunotify code I have, and make > it be a new type of perf counter instead of a character special device. > I'd actually be OK with that, since having an oddball new char dev > interface is not particularly nice. But on the other hand just > multiplex

Re: [ofa-general] Re: [GIT PULL] please pull ummunotify

2009-09-29 Thread Pavel Machek
On Thu 2009-09-17 08:45:29, Roland Dreier wrote: > > > > > Hmm, or are you saying you can only get 1 event per registered range > and > > > > allocate the thing on registration? That'd need some registration limit > > > > to avoid DoS scenarios. > > > > > > Yes, that's what I do. You're ri

Re: [ofa-general] Re: [GIT PULL] please pull ummunotify

2009-09-28 Thread Pavel Machek
On Tue 2009-09-15 07:57:56, Roland Dreier wrote: > > > I don't remember seeing discussion of this on lkml. Yes it is in > > -next... > > eg http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/7/31/197 and followups, or search for v2 > and earlier patches. Well... it seems little overspecialized. Just modifying libc to

Re: [GIT PULL] please pull ummunotify

2009-09-15 Thread Pavel Machek
Hi! > Linus, please consider pulling from > > master.kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/roland/infiniband.git > ummunotify > > This tree is also available from kernel.org mirrors at: > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/roland/infiniband.git > ummunotify > > This will