On 4/6/2011 2:12 PM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
On Wed, Apr 06, 2011 at 06:59:16AM -0400, Hal Rosenstock wrote:
On 4/5/2011 8:40 PM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
Since these are only used by ibdmchk it seems more appropriate to
bundle it in the ibutils package than in infiniband-diags?
No; the idea is
On 4/5/2011 8:40 PM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
Since these are only used by ibdmchk it seems more appropriate to
bundle it in the ibutils package than in infiniband-diags?
No; the idea is that the files can be prepared for ibdmchk on a machine
which does not include ibutils and moved to another
On Wed, Apr 06, 2011 at 06:59:16AM -0400, Hal Rosenstock wrote:
On 4/5/2011 8:40 PM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
Since these are only used by ibdmchk it seems more appropriate to
bundle it in the ibutils package than in infiniband-diags?
No; the idea is that the files can be prepared for
Signed-off-by: Hal Rosenstock h...@mellanox.com
---
Makefile.am |3 ++-
man/dump2psl.8 | 49 +
man/dump2slvl.8 | 32
3 files changed, 83 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 man/dump2psl.8
Since these are only used by ibdmchk it seems more appropriate to
bundle it in the ibutils package than in infiniband-diags?
On Tue, Apr 05, 2011 at 03:30:51PM -0400, Hal Rosenstock wrote:
Signed-off-by: Hal Rosenstock h...@mellanox.com
Makefile.am |3 ++-
man/dump2psl.8 | 49
