> I agree with you on both comments. Would you like me to resend or will
> you make the necessary changes?
please resend, thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.ke
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 10:51:10AM -0700, Roland Dreier wrote:
I agree with you on both comments. Would you like me to resend or will
you make the necessary changes?
>
> > +#if defined(cache_line_size)
>
> Why the #if here? Do we just need to include explicitly
> to make sure we get the defin
> +#if defined(cache_line_size)
Why the #if here? Do we just need to include explicitly
to make sure we get the define?
> +*((u8 *) mailbox->buf + INIT_HCA_CACHELINE_SZ_OFFSET) =
> +order_base_2(cache_line_size() / 16) << 5;
Trivial but I think it's safe to assume a cacheli
ConnectX can work more efficiently if the CPU cache line size is confiugred to
it at INIT_HCA. This patch configures cache line size for systems that report
it.
Signed-off-by: Eli Cohen
---
drivers/net/mlx4/fw.c |7 +++
1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drive
