On 9/15/2011 1:01 AM, Roland Dreier wrote:
Sorry, haven't been very productive, partially due to patchwork being
down (along with the rest of kernel.org). So not much to report...
Roland, Sean was saying (SB) that he has them on the ofa git, so in case
you have
a local clone, maybe you can st
On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 3:15 PM, Steve Wise wrote:
> Is there an ETA on kernel.org getting healthy again?
None that I've heard.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel
On 09/14/2011 05:01 PM, Roland Dreier wrote:
Sorry, haven't been very productive, partially due to patchwork being
down (along with the rest of kernel.org).
So not much to report...
Is there an ETA on kernel.org getting healthy again?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscr
Sorry, haven't been very productive, partially due to patchwork being
down (along with the rest of kernel.org).
So not much to report...
On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 2:00 PM, Hefty, Sean wrote:
> Roland,
>
> Can I get a quick status update regarding this series?
>
> Thanks,
> Sean
>
--
To unsubscribe
Roland,
Can I get a quick status update regarding this series?
Thanks,
Sean
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> The only issue from my viewpoint is whether the change referenced by patch 11
> (ib/cm: Update xrc support based on xrc annex errata) has been approved by the
> IBTA. I'm waiting on a response on that.
I received confirmation that the errata to the XRC Annex was approved. Both
patch 10 (ib/cm
> Great stuff! I'd really like to get this into kernel 3.2... do you have any
> open issues or is it all good from your POV?
The only issue from my viewpoint is whether the change referenced by patch 11
(ib/cm: Update xrc support based on xrc annex errata) has been approved by the
IBTA. I'm wa
Great stuff! I'd really like to get this into kernel 3.2... do you have any
open issues or is it all good from your POV?
- R.
On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 7:14 PM, Hefty, Sean wrote:
> XRC provides a scalability enhancement when a process on one node
> must communicate with multiple processes on an
XRC provides a scalability enhancement when a process on one node
must communicate with multiple processes on another node. This
is commonly the case when running MPI applications on multi-core
systems in a cluster.
An XRC connection consists of an initiator (XRC INI) qp and a target
(XRC TGT) qp
