On Sat, 2012-05-19 at 10:50 +, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On 04/30/12 15:11, David Dillow wrote:
>
> > On Sun, 2012-04-22 at 16:01 +, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> >> On 03/29/12 16:59, Dave Dillow wrote:
> >>> I haven't chewed on the rest yet, but would like to see this one at
> >>> least in 3.4
On 04/30/12 15:11, David Dillow wrote:
> On Sun, 2012-04-22 at 16:01 +, Bart Van Assche wrote:
>> On 03/29/12 16:59, Dave Dillow wrote:
>>> I haven't chewed on the rest yet, but would like to see this one at
>>> least in 3.4 if possible.
>
>> If you have further comments about any of the patc
On Sun, 2012-04-22 at 16:01 +, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On 03/29/12 16:59, Dave Dillow wrote:
> > I haven't chewed on the rest yet, but would like to see this one at
> > least in 3.4 if possible.
> If you have further comments about any of the patches in this series,
> these are welcome. The 3
On 03/29/12 16:59, Dave Dillow wrote:
> [ ... ]
>
> I haven't chewed on the rest yet, but would like to see this one at
> least in 3.4 if possible.
Hi Dave,
If you have further comments about any of the patches in this series,
these are welcome. The 3.5 merge window isn't that far away anymore.
On Sun, Mar 25, 2012 at 10:47:06AM -0400, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> Enlarge the block layer timeout for disks such that it is above
> the InfiniBand transport layer timeout. This is necessary to avoid
> that an SRP response is received after the SCSI layer has already
> killed the associated SCSI co
Enlarge the block layer timeout for disks such that it is above
the InfiniBand transport layer timeout. This is necessary to avoid
that an SRP response is received after the SCSI layer has already
killed the associated SCSI command.
Signed-off-by: Bart Van Assche
Cc: David Dillow
Cc: Roland Drei
