On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 1:46 AM, Karandeep Chahal wrote:
> In my experience with ib-srp, I am not sure if there is such a thing as link
> going down for a short time. When the link goes down, no matter how short
> the duration (< 1s), IO fails over, this failover takes very long time
> currently.
In my experience with ib-srp, I am not sure if there is such a thing as
link going down for a short time. When the link goes down, no matter how
short the duration (< 1s), IO fails over, this failover takes very long
time currently. Or, I would like to know if you can get a ib-srp
failover time
On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 7:06 AM, David Dillow wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-05-29 at 17:07 -0400, Karandeep Chahal wrote:
>> Subject: [PATCH] Infiniband srp fast failover patch.
>
> This conflicts with Bart's patches to improve failover; it will be much
> better to use his approach to block the target rat
Hi Dave,
As long as we get faster failover I am happy with Bart's patch.
Currently when I run IO to several luns over multipath and the preferred
path goes down, the system hangs until the IO fails over. Even ssh'ing
into the systems take 20-30 seconds. I *suspect* that is because IO is
being
On Tue, 2012-05-29 at 17:07 -0400, Karandeep Chahal wrote:
> Subject: [PATCH] Infiniband srp fast failover patch.
This conflicts with Bart's patches to improve failover; it will be much
better to use his approach to block the target rather than remove it
wholesale -- we could have lost connectivit
Thank you for clarifying!
On 05/29/2012 03:27 PM, Karandeep Chahal wrote:
Hi Michael,
Yes, I tried reconnecting the targets and removing reinserting ib-srp.
Thanks
Karan
On 05/29/2012 05:51 PM, Michael Reed wrote:
Did you subsequently reconnect the target and confirm appropriate behavior?
Hi Michael,
Yes, I tried reconnecting the targets and removing reinserting ib-srp.
Thanks
Karan
On 05/29/2012 05:51 PM, Michael Reed wrote:
Did you subsequently reconnect the target and confirm appropriate behavior?
On 05/29/2012 02:07 PM, Karandeep Chahal wrote:
Subject: [PATCH] Infiniban
Did you subsequently reconnect the target and confirm appropriate behavior?
On 05/29/2012 02:07 PM, Karandeep Chahal wrote:
Subject: [PATCH] Infiniband srp fast failover patch. Currently ib_srp does
not do anything on receiving a DREQ from the target, it
only sends a response back. Furthe
Subject: [PATCH] Infiniband srp fast failover patch. Currently ib_srp does
not do anything on receiving a DREQ from the target, it
only sends a response back. Further it also does not
monitor port (down) events. I have patched srp to remove
scsi devices when a port down event is received or if
