Re: [PATCH 1/2] Use autoreconf in autogen.sh

2013-04-22 Thread Jeff Squyres (jsquyres)
On Apr 19, 2013, at 8:19 PM, "Hefty, Sean" wrote: > It may help if you identify the library this patch is against. :) 3rd time sending will be the charm... :-) -- Jeff Squyres jsquy...@cisco.com For corporate legal information go to: http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/

RE: [PATCH 1/2] Use autoreconf in autogen.sh

2013-04-19 Thread Hefty, Sean
> Any thoughts on these two patches? They're pretty trivial, enable use with > modern versions of Autotools, and now feature the proper Signed-off-by line. It may help if you identify the library this patch is against. :) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" i

Re: [PATCH 1/2] Use autoreconf in autogen.sh

2013-04-19 Thread Jeff Squyres (jsquyres)
Bump. Any thoughts on these two patches? They're pretty trivial, enable use with modern versions of Autotools, and now feature the proper Signed-off-by line. On Apr 13, 2013, at 8:15 AM, Jeff Squyres wrote: > The old sequence of Autotools commands listed in autogen.sh is no > longer correct.

[PATCH 1/2] Use autoreconf in autogen.sh

2013-04-13 Thread Jeff Squyres
The old sequence of Autotools commands listed in autogen.sh is no longer correct. Instead, just use the single "autoreconf" command, which will invoke all the Right Autotools commands in the correct order. Signed-off-by: Jeff Squyres --- autogen.sh | 6 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 5