On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 09:16:28AM -0800, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> How about renaming blk_iopoll into blk_poll ? That way the name still
> refers to the block layer. And although the current implementation performs
> polling from IRQ context future implementations maybe will allow polling
> from
On 11/17/2015 09:16 AM, Bart Van Assche wrote:
On 11/13/2015 11:02 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 11:19:24AM -0800, Bart Van Assche wrote:
On 11/13/2015 05:46 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
The new name is irq_poll as iopoll is already taken. Better suggestions
welcome.
On 11/13/2015 11:02 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 11:19:24AM -0800, Bart Van Assche wrote:
On 11/13/2015 05:46 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
The new name is irq_poll as iopoll is already taken. Better suggestions
welcome.
Would it be possible to provide more background
On 15/11/2015 11:04, Or Gerlitz wrote:
On Sun, Nov 15, 2015 at 10:48 AM, Sagi Grimberg
wrote:
Or is correct,
I have attempted to convert iser to use blk_iopoll in the past, however
I've seen inconsistent performance and latency skews (comparing to
tasklets iser is using today). This was mani
On Sun, Nov 15, 2015 at 10:48:41AM +0200, Sagi Grimberg wrote:
> I have attempted to convert iser to use blk_iopoll in the past, however
> I've seen inconsistent performance and latency skews (comparing to
> tasklets iser is using today). This was manifested in IOPs test cases
> where I ran multipl
On Sun, Nov 15, 2015 at 10:48 AM, Sagi Grimberg
wrote:
> Or is correct,
>
> I have attempted to convert iser to use blk_iopoll in the past, however
> I've seen inconsistent performance and latency skews (comparing to
> tasklets iser is using today). This was manifested in IOPs test cases
> where I
On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 3:46 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
The new name is irq_poll as iopoll is already taken. Better suggestions
welcome.
Sagi (or Christoph if you can address that),
@ some pointer over the last 18 months there was a port done at
mellanox for iser to use blk-iopoll and AF
On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 11:19:24AM -0800, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On 11/13/2015 05:46 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>> The new name is irq_poll as iopoll is already taken. Better suggestions
>> welcome.
>
> Hello Christoph,
>
> Would it be possible to provide more background information about this
On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 05:23:39PM +0200, Or Gerlitz wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 3:46 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > The new name is irq_poll as iopoll is already taken. Better suggestions
> > welcome.
>
> Sagi (or Christoph if you can address that),
>
> @ some pointer over the last 18 m
On 11/13/2015 05:46 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
The new name is irq_poll as iopoll is already taken. Better suggestions
welcome.
Hello Christoph,
Would it be possible to provide more background information about this ?
Which other kernel subsystem is using the name iopoll ? I think the name
On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 3:46 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> The new name is irq_poll as iopoll is already taken. Better suggestions
> welcome.
Sagi (or Christoph if you can address that),
@ some pointer over the last 18 months there was a port done at
mellanox for iser to use blk-iopoll and AFA
The new name is irq_poll as iopoll is already taken. Better suggestions
welcome.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig
---
Documentation/kernel-per-CPU-kthreads.txt | 2 +-
block/Makefile| 2 +-
block/blk-iopoll.c| 224 -
12 matches
Mail list logo