On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 04:43:54PM -0400, Chuck Lever wrote:
> I think the sanity check you pointed out is strictly satisfied by
> testing against the unaligned number of bytes. Is there a strong
> reason to do the extra math for that check during each WRITE?
I can't think of any good reason why t
[ Correcting Steve’s e-mail address ]
On Jul 10, 2014, at 3:43 PM, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 03:07:34PM -0400, Chuck Lever wrote:
>> Hi Bruce-
>>
>> On Jul 10, 2014, at 2:49 PM, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 02:24:57PM -0400, Chuck Lever wrote:
>
On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 03:07:34PM -0400, Chuck Lever wrote:
> Hi Bruce-
>
> On Jul 10, 2014, at 2:49 PM, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 02:24:57PM -0400, Chuck Lever wrote:
> >>
> >> On Jul 10, 2014, at 2:19 PM, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at
Hi Bruce-
On Jul 10, 2014, at 2:49 PM, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 02:24:57PM -0400, Chuck Lever wrote:
>>
>> On Jul 10, 2014, at 2:19 PM, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 01:44:35PM -0400, Chuck Lever wrote:
The server should comply with RFC 566
On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 02:24:57PM -0400, Chuck Lever wrote:
>
> On Jul 10, 2014, at 2:19 PM, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 01:44:35PM -0400, Chuck Lever wrote:
> >> The server should comply with RFC 5667,
> >
> > Where's the relevant language? (I took a quick look but d
On Jul 10, 2014, at 2:19 PM, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 01:44:35PM -0400, Chuck Lever wrote:
>> The server should comply with RFC 5667,
>
> Where's the relevant language? (I took a quick look but didn't see it.)
Sorry, I listed the wrong RFC when I wrote the description
On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 01:44:35PM -0400, Chuck Lever wrote:
> The server should comply with RFC 5667,
Where's the relevant language? (I took a quick look but didn't see it.)
> and handle WRITE payloads
> that may not have a zero pad on the end (XDR length round-up).
>
> Fixes: f34b9568 (The NF
The server should comply with RFC 5667, and handle WRITE payloads
that may not have a zero pad on the end (XDR length round-up).
Fixes: f34b9568 (The NFSv2/NFSv3 server does not handle zero...)
BugLink: https://bugzilla.linux-nfs.org/show_bug.cgi?id=246
Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever
---
fs/nfsd/nf
