Roland Dreier wrote:
> Roland, looking on your for-next branch I see that it contains single
> one liner patch "RDMA/cxgb3: Remove BUG_ON() on CQ rearm failure" for
> 2.6.34 while there are couple of patches targeted for the coming
> window ... are you planning to get merging start running so
> Roland, looking on your for-next branch I see that it contains single
> one liner patch "RDMA/cxgb3: Remove BUG_ON() on CQ rearm failure" for
> 2.6.34 while there are couple of patches targeted for the coming
> window ... are you planning to get merging start running soon?
Yes.
--
Roland Dr
Or Gerlitz wrote:
I'd be happy to get this in for the 2.6.34 merge window which is coming quite
soon
Roland, looking on your for-next branch I see that it contains single
one liner patch "RDMA/cxgb3: Remove BUG_ON() on CQ rearm failure" for
2.6.34 while there are couple of patches targeted for
The following patch set removes some inefficiencies in the iser data path
through simplification and reducing the amount of code, using less atomic
operations, avoiding TX interrupts, moving to iscsi passthrough mode,
etc. I did my best to build it as a sequence of patches and not as one
big re-wri
