On 13/08/2013 22:18, Roland Dreier wrote:
Yes, you have tried to answer those questions separately but do you
think git writes changelogs magically when a patch is applied? If you
don't supply a good enough changelog, you're expecting me to write it
for you.
I never expected you to write our c
On 14/08/2013 12:06, Or Gerlitz wrote:
On 13/08/2013 22:18, Roland Dreier wrote:
>+struct ib_uverbs_cmd_hdr_ex {
>+ __u32 command;
>+ __u16 in_words;
>+ __u16 out_words;
>+ __u16 provider_in_words;
>+ __u16 provider_out_words;
>+ __u32 cmd_hdr_reserved;
>+};
>
On 13/08/2013 22:18, Roland Dreier wrote:
>+struct ib_uverbs_cmd_hdr_ex {
>+ __u32 command;
>+ __u16 in_words;
>+ __u16 out_words;
>+ __u16 provider_in_words;
>+ __u16 provider_out_words;
>+ __u32 cmd_hdr_reserved;
>+};
>+
If I understand the vague explanation
> Add Infra-structure to support extended uverbs capabilities in a
> forward/backward
> manner. Uverbs command opcodes which are based on the verbs extensions
> approach should
> be greater or equal to IB_USER_VERBS_CMD_THRESHOLD. They have new header
> format
> and processed a bit differently.
From: Igor Ivanov
Add Infra-structure to support extended uverbs capabilities in a
forward/backward
manner. Uverbs command opcodes which are based on the verbs extensions approach
should
be greater or equal to IB_USER_VERBS_CMD_THRESHOLD. They have new header format
and processed a bit differen
