On 10/20/2015 04:35 AM, Haggai Eran wrote:
> On 20/10/2015 10:20, Doug Ledford wrote:
>> On 10/20/2015 02:53 AM, Haggai Eran wrote:
>>> When discussing the patches to demux ids in rdma_cm instead of ib_cm, it
>>> was decided that it is best to use the P_Key value in the packet headers.
>>> However,
On 20/10/2015 10:20, Doug Ledford wrote:
> On 10/20/2015 02:53 AM, Haggai Eran wrote:
>> When discussing the patches to demux ids in rdma_cm instead of ib_cm, it
>> was decided that it is best to use the P_Key value in the packet headers.
>> However, the mlx5 and ipath drivers are currently unable
On 10/20/2015 02:53 AM, Haggai Eran wrote:
> When discussing the patches to demux ids in rdma_cm instead of ib_cm, it
> was decided that it is best to use the P_Key value in the packet headers.
> However, the mlx5 and ipath drivers are currently unable to send correct
> P_Key values in GMP headers.
When discussing the patches to demux ids in rdma_cm instead of ib_cm, it
was decided that it is best to use the P_Key value in the packet headers.
However, the mlx5 and ipath drivers are currently unable to send correct
P_Key values in GMP headers. They always send using a single P_Key that is
set
