Re: [PATCH v1 for-next 0/7] Add support for multicast loopback prevention to mlx4

On Wed, 26 Aug 2015, eran ben elisha wrote: > > Do you have this in a git tree somewhere for testing? > > Yes, > please pull from https://github.com/eranbenelisha/linux branch > rebased-for-4.3/lb_prev > > If you with to get the user space as well for testing, please use: >

Re: [PATCH v1 for-next 0/7] Add support for multicast loopback prevention to mlx4

On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 7:05 PM, Doug Ledford wrote: > I'll have some sort of answer for that soon. I spent the better part of > last week, and what time I worked on the weekend, plus all day yesterday > on the internal infrastructure here at Red Hat. We're experiencing some

Re: [PATCH v1 for-next 0/7] Add support for multicast loopback prevention to mlx4

On 10/06/2015 04:54 PM, Or Gerlitz wrote: > On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 7:05 PM, Doug Ledford wrote: >> I'll have some sort of answer for that soon. I spent the better part of >> last week, and what time I worked on the weekend, plus all day yesterday >> on the internal

Re: [PATCH v1 for-next 0/7] Add support for multicast loopback prevention to mlx4

On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 12:26 AM, Doug Ledford wrote: > Nothing so simple unfortunately. And it isn't an IB/RoCE cluster, it's > IB/IB/OPA/RoCE/IWARP cluster. Regardless though, that's not my problem > and what I'm chasing. To be precise no two transports out of

Re: [PATCH v1 for-next 0/7] Add support for multicast loopback prevention to mlx4

On 10/06/2015 12:54 PM, Sagi Grimberg wrote: >> Then I have to see if any of the currently posted fixes for 4.3rc that >> I haven't grabbed yet >> resolve the iSER issue I'm seeing, then I'll move on to for-next >> processing. > > Anything I can help with Doug? I'll tell you in a few hours. --

Re: [PATCH v1 for-next 0/7] Add support for multicast loopback prevention to mlx4

Then I have to see if any of the currently posted fixes for 4.3rc that I haven't grabbed yet resolve the iSER issue I'm seeing, then I'll move on to for-next processing. Anything I can help with Doug? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a

Re: [PATCH v1 for-next 0/7] Add support for multicast loopback prevention to mlx4

On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 9:24 PM, Doug Ledford wrote: > I'm getting ready to tackle the for-next backlog. Sounds, good, rc4 is here... so lets get things going. I see that there is a 4.4 branch @ your kernel.org tree with the checksum bits, is there anything else which you've

Re: [PATCH v1 for-next 0/7] Add support for multicast loopback prevention to mlx4

On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 5:34 PM, Eran Ben Elisha wrote: > Hi Doug, > > This patch-set adds a new implementation for multicast loopback prevention > for > mlx4 driver. The current implementation is very limited, especially if link > layer is Ethernet. The new implementation

Re: [PATCH v1 for-next 0/7] Add support for multicast loopback prevention to mlx4

On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 7:44 PM, Christoph Lameter c...@linux.com wrote: On Thu, 20 Aug 2015, Eran Ben Elisha wrote: This patch-set adds a new implementation for multicast loopback prevention for mlx4 driver. The current implementation is very limited, especially if link layer is

Re: [PATCH v1 for-next 0/7] Add support for multicast loopback prevention to mlx4

On Thu, 20 Aug 2015, Eran Ben Elisha wrote: This patch-set adds a new implementation for multicast loopback prevention for mlx4 driver. The current implementation is very limited, especially if link layer is Ethernet. The new implementation is based on HW feature of dropping incoming

[PATCH v1 for-next 0/7] Add support for multicast loopback prevention to mlx4

Hi Doug, This patch-set adds a new implementation for multicast loopback prevention for mlx4 driver. The current implementation is very limited, especially if link layer is Ethernet. The new implementation is based on HW feature of dropping incoming multicast packets if the sender QP counter