On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 01:47:53PM +0200, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> The only reason why patches 10/12 and 11/12 are separate patches
> is to reduce the size of individual patches and hence to make it
> easier to review these patches. If everyone agrees I'm fine with
> folding patch 11/12 into patch
On 10/17/14 12:59, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Tue, Oct 07, 2014 at 03:06:54PM +0200, Bart Van Assche wrote:
The free_reqs list is no longer needed now that we are using
tags assigned by the block layer. Hence remove it.
Is there any good reason not to fold this into the previous patch?
The
On 10/17/2014 1:59 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Tue, Oct 07, 2014 at 03:06:54PM +0200, Bart Van Assche wrote:
The free_reqs list is no longer needed now that we are using
tags assigned by the block layer. Hence remove it.
Is there any good reason not to fold this into the previous patch?
On Tue, Oct 07, 2014 at 03:06:54PM +0200, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> The free_reqs list is no longer needed now that we are using
> tags assigned by the block layer. Hence remove it.
Is there any good reason not to fold this into the previous patch?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "
The free_reqs list is no longer needed now that we are using
tags assigned by the block layer. Hence remove it.
Signed-off-by: Bart Van Assche
Cc: Sagi Grimberg
Cc: Sebastian Parschauer
---
drivers/infiniband/ulp/srp/ib_srp.c | 24 +---
drivers/infiniband/ulp/srp/ib_srp.h |
